Tools & Wizards About Us
mail.tom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 55% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

mail.tom.com

TOM免费邮箱注册，用户最常使用个人电子邮箱邮件服务商之一

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

831 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

114 ms

mail.tom.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mail.tom.com now to see the best up-to-date Mail Tom content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mail.tom.com

TOM免费邮箱注册-中文电子邮箱最早期品牌之一，设有独立海外服务器，安全加密通道，多通道7*24小时客户服务。邮箱支持各种客户端收发，垃圾邮件拦截率超98%。好用的安全邮箱有：免费邮箱,企业邮箱,商务邮箱,VIP邮箱

Visit mail.tom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mail.tom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 831 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mail.tom.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.441

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mail.tom.com

831 ms

base.css

209 ms

swiper.min.css

420 ms

index.css

607 ms

mobile.css

622 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Mail.tom.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Tom.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Mail.tom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 192.2 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mail.tom.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 26.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mail Tom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 155.4 kB

  • Original 226.4 kB
  • After minification 226.4 kB
  • After compression 71.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 155.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 7.9 kB
  • After minification 7.9 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mail.tom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (47%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mail Tom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mail.tom.com

mail.tom.com

831 ms

base.css

base.css

209 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

420 ms

index.css

index.css

607 ms

mobile.css

mobile.css

622 ms

jquery-3.6.min.js

jquery-3.6.min.js

832 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

658 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1059 ms

index.js

index.js

813 ms

get_track.min.js

get_track.min.js

2669 ms

LOGO@3x.png

LOGO@3x.png

826 ms

phoneconnect.png

phoneconnect.png

846 ms

wxconnect.png

wxconnect.png

1017 ms

qrconnect.png

qrconnect.png

1034 ms

banner2.png

banner2.png

1662 ms

qiyoubanner1.jpg

qiyoubanner1.jpg

4158 ms

banner.png

banner.png

1830 ms

people.png

people.png

1745 ms

selectrow.png

selectrow.png

1278 ms

lock.png

lock.png

1483 ms

wechat-icon.png

wechat-icon.png

1645 ms

success.png

success.png

1692 ms

release.png

release.png

2449 ms

ewm.png

ewm.png

1873 ms

LOGO@3x.png

LOGO@3x.png

1911 ms

hide.png

hide.png

1984 ms

show.png

show.png

2032 ms

jump_bg_mb.png

jump_bg_mb.png

2090 ms

jump_top_banner1.png

jump_top_banner1.png

2957 ms

bgForm.png

bgForm.png

1568 ms

error.png

error.png

1611 ms

Accessibility Review

mail.tom.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mail.tom.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mail.tom.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mail.tom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mail.tom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mail.tom.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mail Tom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: