Tools & Wizards About Us
rrb.testbag.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 42

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

rrb.testbag.com

RRB GROUP D Mock Test 2023 | RRB GROUP D Mock Test & Test Series Online

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

144 ms

rrb.testbag.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rrb.testbag.com now to see the best up-to-date RRB Test Bag content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rrb.testbag.com

RRB Group D Mock Test ? get free RAILWAY RRB RRC GROUP D test series, previous years question paper for RRB Group D based on latest pattern, syllabus, exam date, application form at rrb.testbag.com In...

Visit rrb.testbag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rrb.testbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rrb.testbag.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,840 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.419

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rrb.testbag.com

1952 ms

abs.css

445 ms

bootstrapmin.css

1763 ms

bootstrapthememin.css

886 ms

jquery_min.js

1780 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Rrb.testbag.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rrb.testbag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 425.4 kB (63%)

Content Size

678.6 kB

After Optimization

253.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rrb.testbag.com main page is 678.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 448.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 70.4 kB

  • Original 86.8 kB
  • After minification 74.7 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 17.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RRB Test Bag needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 249.4 kB

  • Original 448.1 kB
  • After minification 404.7 kB
  • After compression 198.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.4 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 101.4 kB

  • Original 122.1 kB
  • After minification 120.3 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rrb.testbag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (49%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RRB Test Bag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rrb.testbag.com

rrb.testbag.com

1952 ms

abs.css

abs.css

445 ms

bootstrapmin.css

bootstrapmin.css

1763 ms

bootstrapthememin.css

bootstrapthememin.css

886 ms

jquery_min.js

jquery_min.js

1780 ms

bootstrap_min.js

bootstrap_min.js

1119 ms

html5shiv-printshiv.js

html5shiv-printshiv.js

5 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

8 ms

gen_validatorv31.js

gen_validatorv31.js

927 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

1107 ms

common.js

common.js

1113 ms

form-field-tooltip.css

form-field-tooltip.css

1129 ms

rounded-corners.js

rounded-corners.js

1371 ms

form-field-tooltip.js

form-field-tooltip.js

1324 ms

jquery-1.2.2.pack.js

jquery-1.2.2.pack.js

1344 ms

facebox.css

facebox.css

1133 ms

facebox.js

facebox.js

1321 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

1379 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

1378 ms

style.css

style.css

1537 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

AC_RunActiveContent.js

1542 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

7 ms

counter.js

counter.js

8 ms

logo.png

logo.png

223 ms

register.gif

register.gif

226 ms

subscribe.gif

subscribe.gif

223 ms

testbag-link.gif

testbag-link.gif

225 ms

login1.png

login1.png

228 ms

mock_test.png

mock_test.png

227 ms

testbag-facebook.gif

testbag-facebook.gif

437 ms

testbag-twitter.gif

testbag-twitter.gif

438 ms

testbag-blog.gif

testbag-blog.gif

438 ms

testbag-in.gif

testbag-in.gif

438 ms

7r9zjd.jpg

7r9zjd.jpg

504 ms

fglance.gif

fglance.gif

505 ms

testbtn.gif

testbtn.gif

653 ms

ca-pub-9781371773450465.js

ca-pub-9781371773450465.js

49 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

48 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

86 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Question-Bank-with-Self-Assessor.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Question-Bank-with-Self-Assessor.gif

622 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Unit-Tests-with-Topic-Simulator.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Unit-Tests-with-Topic-Simulator.gif

625 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Mock-Test-Old-Paper.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Mock-Test-Old-Paper.gif

625 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Offline-Assessments.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Offline-Assessments.gif

627 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Teacher-Interface.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Teacher-Interface.gif

630 ms

border-1.gif

border-1.gif

841 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Report-&-Analytics.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Report-&-Analytics.gif

819 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Comparative-study.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Comparative-study.gif

823 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-e-learning.png

rrb-ntpc-g-e-learning.png

824 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Know-Your-Exams.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Know-Your-Exams.gif

827 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Study-Materials.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Study-Materials.gif

832 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Class-Room-Courses.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Class-Room-Courses.gif

1035 ms

rrb-ntpc-g-Knowledge-Today.gif

rrb-ntpc-g-Knowledge-Today.gif

1036 ms

ga.js

ga.js

9 ms

t.php

t.php

146 ms

ajax_db_country_state_city.php

ajax_db_country_state_city.php

1010 ms

ajax_db_country_state_city.php

ajax_db_country_state_city.php

1007 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

37 ms

undefined

undefined

1007 ms

closelabel.gif

closelabel.gif

1010 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1213 ms

b.png

b.png

1215 ms

bl.png

bl.png

1217 ms

br.png

br.png

1217 ms

tl.png

tl.png

1219 ms

tr.png

tr.png

1228 ms

ads

ads

256 ms

osd.js

osd.js

13 ms

ads

ads

248 ms

ads

ads

236 ms

css

css

54 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

29 ms

abg.js

abg.js

30 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

53 ms

s

s

40 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

47 ms

favicon

favicon

82 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

16 ms

E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js

E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

rrb.testbag.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

rrb.testbag.com best practices score

42

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rrb.testbag.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rrb.testbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rrb.testbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rrb.testbag.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RRB Test Bag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: