Tools & Wizards About Us
t-rak.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

t-rak.co.uk

T Rak – Kitchen and Bathroom Refurbishment Specialist

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

234 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

455 ms

t-rak.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing T Rak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about t-rak.co.uk

Visit t-rak.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed T-rak.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

t-rak.co.uk performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

t-rak.co.uk

234 ms

t-rak.co.uk

474 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

89 ms

frontend.min.css

173 ms

css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original T-rak.co.uk, 20% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (722 ms) belongs to the original domain T-rak.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 259.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of T-rak.co.uk main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 112.2 kB

  • Original 132.3 kB
  • After minification 130.6 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 147.4 kB

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. T Rak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 75 B

  • Original 107.1 kB
  • After minification 107.1 kB
  • After compression 107.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 90 B

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 59.2 kB
  • After compression 59.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. T-rak.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (84%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of T Rak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

t-rak.co.uk

t-rak.co.uk

234 ms

t-rak.co.uk

t-rak.co.uk

474 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

89 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

173 ms

css

css

37 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

244 ms

wpforms-base.min.css

wpforms-base.min.css

247 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

249 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

334 ms

post-986.css

post-986.css

253 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

253 ms

css

css

34 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

326 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

328 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

326 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

333 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

347 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

418 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

497 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

417 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

417 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

417 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

442 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

519 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

516 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

517 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

517 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

519 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

580 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

581 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

582 ms

Logo-1-e1659980389262-200x66.png

Logo-1-e1659980389262-200x66.png

665 ms

IMG_5267-V2.jpg

IMG_5267-V2.jpg

98 ms

Untitled-2.png

Untitled-2.png

174 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

17 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

24 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

39 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

46 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

47 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

47 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

46 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

47 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2RlV9Su1fah.woff

45 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

370 ms

IMG_5267-V2.jpg

IMG_5267-V2.jpg

722 ms

Untitled-2.png

Untitled-2.png

553 ms

Accessibility Review

t-rak.co.uk accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

t-rak.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

t-rak.co.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise T-rak.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that T-rak.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

t-rak.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of T Rak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: