57 sec in total
657 ms
41.8 sec
14.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Tablesorter content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tablesorter.com
Visit tablesorter.comWe analyzed Tablesorter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 657 ms and then it took 56.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
tablesorter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.8 s
45/100
10%
657 ms
277 ms
273 ms
274 ms
527 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Tablesorter.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Match.adsrvr.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Http18369.storage.akadns.net.
Page size can be reduced by 909.3 kB (63%)
1.4 MB
529.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Tablesorter.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tablesorter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 853.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 853.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tablesorter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (78%)
89
20
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tablesorter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tablesorter.com
657 ms
277 ms
jq.css
273 ms
style.css
274 ms
jquery-latest.js
527 ms
__jquery.tablesorter.min.js
401 ms
chili-1.8b.js
284 ms
docs.js
245 ms
urchin.js
4 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
1203 ms
pixel.gif
1125 ms
uat_17949.js
14 ms
adserv_17949.js
1245 ms
technorati-tech_tag.js
219 ms
usermatch
252 ms
idSync
307 ms
generic
240 ms
user_sync.html
289 ms
bounce
482 ms
usermatch
882 ms
generic
894 ms
showad.js
1229 ms
search.js
1203 ms
ttj
1099 ms
pixel
1205 ms
cm
907 ms
casale
1371 ms
casale
1301 ms
usermatchredir
1408 ms
r.js
1611 ms
PugMaster
1213 ms
search.js
1854 ms
jstag
1858 ms
pixel
1816 ms
crum
1714 ms
crum
1929 ms
crum
1928 ms
Wa7JaNHM41MAAE89TSoAAACwAncAAAIB
1874 ms
cfcm.ashx
1611 ms
pixel
1844 ms
generic
1838 ms
crum
1505 ms
default
664 ms
demconf.jpg
646 ms
Pug
749 ms
Pug
674 ms
Pug
599 ms
Pug
801 ms
Pug
1281 ms
pixel
2060 ms
usersync
1399 ms
1
2027 ms
acj
1095 ms
generic
1092 ms
Pug
1264 ms
Pug
1358 ms
receive
847 ms
tap.php
818 ms
psa.js
781 ms
1220 ms
smokeybear_728x90.gif
681 ms
async_usersync.html
526 ms
uat_17949.js
81 ms
adserv_17949.js
524 ms
ttj
14 ms
ttj
78 ms
acj
81 ms
smokeybear_300x250.gif
201 ms
adserv_17949.js
317 ms
technorati
165 ms
bsredirect5.js
802 ms
ca
4239 ms
moatad.js
1032 ms
bsredirect5_internal22.js
319 ms
bst2tv3.html
3153 ms
verifyc.js
393 ms
dv-match4.js
204 ms
bsevent.gif
1696 ms
a4bde6a98cb92777bc207e0c241317e6.gif
1922 ms
s.js
3370 ms
n.js
3130 ms
cap
1120 ms
ca
289 ms
ca
291 ms
external.png
1102 ms
a4bde6a98cb92777bc207e0c241317e6.gif
20531 ms
__utm.gif
1249 ms
javascript.js
1563 ms
html.js
1444 ms
css.js
1467 ms
bsevent.gif
516 ms
desc.gif
484 ms
bg.gif
485 ms
asc.gif
448 ms
javascript.css
532 ms
html.css
379 ms
css.css
309 ms
get
230 ms
get
383 ms
pd
166 ms
cfcm.ashx
752 ms
openx
420 ms
pixel
437 ms
sd
450 ms
sd
440 ms
sd
409 ms
sd
408 ms
sd
110 ms
p2
115 ms
www.acxiom.com
117 ms
tablesorter.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
tablesorter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
tablesorter.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tablesorter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tablesorter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tablesorter.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tablesorter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: