Tools & Wizards About Us
takefile.link screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

takefile.link

TakeFile - Easy way to share your files

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

476 ms

Resources Loaded

790 ms

Page Rendered

246 ms

takefile.link screenshot

About Website

Visit takefile.link now to see the best up-to-date Take File content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about takefile.link

TakeFile - Free file upload service

Visit takefile.link

Key Findings

We analyzed Takefile.link page load time and found that the first response time was 476 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

takefile.link performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

takefile.link

476 ms

style.css

108 ms

styles.css

121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

94 ms

jquery.min.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Takefile.link, 10% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (476 ms) belongs to the original domain Takefile.link.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.7 kB (78%)

Content Size

262.4 kB

After Optimization

57.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Takefile.link main page is 262.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 222.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 14.7 kB
  • After minification 11.3 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 21.4 kB

  • Original 24.9 kB
  • After minification 9.0 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 171.6 kB

  • Original 222.8 kB
  • After minification 207.2 kB
  • After compression 51.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Takefile.link needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 171.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (21%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Take File. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

takefile.link

takefile.link

476 ms

style.css

style.css

108 ms

styles.css

styles.css

121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

94 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

jquery.paging.js

jquery.paging.js

88 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

87 ms

paging.js

paging.js

73 ms

share.js

share.js

86 ms

logo_big.png

logo_big.png

15 ms

flags.png

flags.png

14 ms

bk1.png

bk1.png

173 ms

BIG-LOGO.png

BIG-LOGO.png

177 ms

88x31_wm_blue_on_white_ru.png

88x31_wm_blue_on_white_ru.png

12 ms

v_blue_on_white_ru.png

v_blue_on_white_ru.png

11 ms

logo_small.png

logo_small.png

15 ms

ico_fb.png

ico_fb.png

13 ms

ico_tr.png

ico_tr.png

15 ms

ico_gp.png

ico_gp.png

14 ms

ico_vk.png

ico_vk.png

15 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

16 ms

SEO Factors

takefile.link SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Takefile.link can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Takefile.link main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

takefile.link

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Take File. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: