3.7 sec in total
789 ms
2.7 sec
132 ms
Welcome to talklog.net homepage info - get ready to check Talklog best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about talklog.net
sms-шпион позволяющий осуществлять удаленое наблюдение за сотовым телефоном и читать чужие смс-ки
Visit talklog.netWe analyzed Talklog.net page load time and found that the first response time was 789 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
talklog.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value4.1 s
78/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value6.5 s
58/100
10%
789 ms
119 ms
67 ms
688 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Talklog.net, 12% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (851 ms) belongs to the original domain Talklog.net.
Page size can be reduced by 97.7 kB (28%)
355.2 kB
257.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Talklog.net main page is 355.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 225.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Talklog needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Talklog.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (29%)
55
39
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Talklog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
talklog.net
789 ms
style.css
119 ms
css
67 ms
openapi.js
688 ms
jquery.min.js
35 ms
share.js
532 ms
plusone.js
80 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
26 ms
all.js
153 ms
ga.js
62 ms
talklog-logo.png
151 ms
phone.png
638 ms
call1.png
378 ms
tape1.png
385 ms
sms1.png
387 ms
mms1.png
386 ms
camera1.png
382 ms
map1.png
495 ms
browser1.png
496 ms
market1.png
503 ms
usb1.png
504 ms
roommonitor1.png
505 ms
privat24.png
612 ms
android.png
607 ms
check.png
620 ms
call.png
627 ms
tape.png
625 ms
sms.png
719 ms
mms.png
730 ms
camera.png
736 ms
map.png
744 ms
browser.png
746 ms
market.png
751 ms
usb.png
830 ms
visa.jpg
846 ms
mc.jpg
851 ms
share.php
185 ms
share_logo.png
329 ms
UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4eWsa1Hk1omyTAFgubFskgE.ttf
63 ms
widgets.js
180 ms
white_carbonfiber.png
825 ms
hit
551 ms
8630
402 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
26 ms
fastbutton
130 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
postmessageRelay
38 ms
api.js
64 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
114 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
126 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
86 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
86 ms
93 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
59 ms
xd_arbiter.php
167 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
56 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.ru.html
50 ms
widget_ru_RU.js
396 ms
jot
101 ms
talklog.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
talklog.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
talklog.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Talklog.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Russian. Our system also found out that Talklog.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
talklog.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Talklog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: