Tools & Wizards About Us
tamaracklandscaping.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

tamaracklandscaping.net

NH Landscaping Services, Mulch, Screened Loam, Tamarack Landscaping, Hudson NH

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

182 ms

tamaracklandscaping.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tamaracklandscaping.net homepage info - get ready to check Tamarack Landscaping best content right away, or after learning these important things about tamaracklandscaping.net

New Hampshire Landscaping Services, Various Mulches, Screened Loam, Soil. Experts in Hardscaping, Irrigation, Landscape Lighting

Visit tamaracklandscaping.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Tamaracklandscaping.net page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tamaracklandscaping.net performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.179

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tamaracklandscaping.net

16 ms

www.tamaracklandscaping.net

73 ms

style.css

52 ms

prettyPhoto.css

87 ms

jquery-1.5.2.js

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Tamaracklandscaping.net, 14% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (660 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 244.9 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

822.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tamaracklandscaping.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 594.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 594.8 kB
  • After minification 591.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tamarack Landscaping images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 183.5 kB

  • Original 402.9 kB
  • After minification 345.3 kB
  • After compression 219.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 183.5 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 46.4 kB

  • Original 53.7 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tamaracklandscaping.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (37%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tamarack Landscaping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tamaracklandscaping.net

tamaracklandscaping.net

16 ms

www.tamaracklandscaping.net

www.tamaracklandscaping.net

73 ms

style.css

style.css

52 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

87 ms

jquery-1.5.2.js

jquery-1.5.2.js

101 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

115 ms

jquery.tweet.js

jquery.tweet.js

73 ms

easing.js

easing.js

70 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

jquery.cycle.all.js

121 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

142 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

117 ms

custom.js

custom.js

163 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

97 ms

ga.js

ga.js

61 ms

pattern-8.jpg

pattern-8.jpg

65 ms

square-1.png

square-1.png

42 ms

banner_small.png

banner_small.png

63 ms

slide-1.jpg

slide-1.jpg

93 ms

slide-2.jpg

slide-2.jpg

81 ms

slide-3.jpg

slide-3.jpg

83 ms

slide-4.jpg

slide-4.jpg

129 ms

slider-arrows.png

slider-arrows.png

82 ms

box-disc.png

box-disc.png

82 ms

separator.png

separator.png

127 ms

box-img-1.jpg

box-img-1.jpg

116 ms

box-img-2.jpg

box-img-2.jpg

154 ms

box-img-3.jpg

box-img-3.jpg

117 ms

footer-square.png

footer-square.png

128 ms

treered.png

treered.png

149 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

153 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

168 ms

google.png

google.png

175 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

165 ms

YanoneKaffeesatz-Regular-webfont.woff

YanoneKaffeesatz-Regular-webfont.woff

193 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

19 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

10 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

30 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

27 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

198 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

660 ms

3588414169-postmessagerelay.js

3588414169-postmessagerelay.js

16 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

7 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

Accessibility Review

tamaracklandscaping.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

tamaracklandscaping.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

tamaracklandscaping.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tamaracklandscaping.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tamaracklandscaping.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tamaracklandscaping.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tamarack Landscaping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: