5 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.5 sec
165 ms
Visit tapecall.net now to see the best up-to-date Tapecall content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tapecall.net
Tapecall
Visit tapecall.netWe analyzed Tapecall.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
tapecall.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value1.6 s
99/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
1330 ms
238 ms
92 ms
176 ms
169 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Tapecall.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Tapecall.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 161.2 kB (57%)
285.0 kB
123.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Tapecall.net main page is 285.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 136.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tapecall needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 65.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 48% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tapecall.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (47%)
30
16
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tapecall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1330 ms
std.css
238 ms
site.css
92 ms
main.css
176 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
169 ms
fancybox.css
190 ms
aska-form.css
173 ms
embed.min.js
171 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
60 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
12 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
175 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
294 ms
tapecall.js
294 ms
aska.js
497 ms
ga.js
59 ms
104 ms
body_bg.png
118 ms
tapecall_nl.png
104 ms
icons.png
118 ms
contents_bg.png
103 ms
tapecall-sprite.png
1069 ms
icon_sprite.png
166 ms
check.png
183 ms
nav_bg.png
184 ms
li_bg.png
197 ms
a_bg.png
197 ms
footer_bg.png
332 ms
footer_sep.png
268 ms
zekton_rg-webfont.woff
307 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
print.css
85 ms
tapecall.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
tapecall.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
tapecall.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tapecall.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tapecall.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tapecall.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tapecall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: