Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

tapecall.net screenshot

About Website

Visit tapecall.net now to see the best up-to-date Tapecall content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tapecall.net

Tapecall

Visit tapecall.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Tapecall.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tapecall.net performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1330 ms

std.css

238 ms

site.css

92 ms

main.css

176 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Tapecall.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Tapecall.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 161.2 kB (57%)

Content Size

285.0 kB

After Optimization

123.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Tapecall.net main page is 285.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 136.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 11.1 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tapecall needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 65.0 kB

  • Original 136.2 kB
  • After minification 121.6 kB
  • After compression 71.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 84.6 kB

  • Original 103.1 kB
  • After minification 82.5 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tapecall.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (47%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tapecall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tapecall.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

tapecall.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

tapecall.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tapecall.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tapecall.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tapecall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: