Tools & Wizards About Us
targetg.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

targetg.in

Digital Marketing Agency in Bangalore - TargetG

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

358 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

366 ms

targetg.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing TargetG content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about targetg.in

TargetG is a digital marketing agency in Bangalore that helps brands 10X their story across digital platforms. Chat with us today!

Visit targetg.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Targetg.in page load time and found that the first response time was 358 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

targetg.in performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,260 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.389

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

targetg.in

358 ms

layout.css

168 ms

home.css

162 ms

slide1.jpg

164 ms

slide2.jpg

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Targetg.in, 6% (3 requests) were made to Pkt.zoosnet.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Targetg.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.8 kB (55%)

Content Size

27.1 kB

After Optimization

12.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Targetg.in main page is 27.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 17.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 17.3 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 6.1 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TargetG images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 841 B

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 841 B or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 226 B

  • Original 716 B
  • After minification 698 B
  • After compression 490 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Targetg.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226 B or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (32%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

34

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TargetG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

targetg.in

targetg.in

358 ms

layout.css

layout.css

168 ms

home.css

home.css

162 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

164 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

185 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

162 ms

hammer.gif

hammer.gif

243 ms

hgm-mill.gif

hgm-mill.gif

312 ms

jc-crusher-b.gif

jc-crusher-b.gif

309 ms

pcl-crusher.gif

pcl-crusher.gif

310 ms

project1.jpg

project1.jpg

453 ms

project2.jpg

project2.jpg

210 ms

project3.jpg

project3.jpg

263 ms

project4.jpg

project4.jpg

1454 ms

project5.jpg

project5.jpg

1455 ms

project6.jpg

project6.jpg

2463 ms

project7.jpg

project7.jpg

2435 ms

project8.jpg

project8.jpg

2444 ms

livechat.js

livechat.js

2444 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

3456 ms

jquery.waitforimages.js

jquery.waitforimages.js

3457 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

3453 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

jquery.cycle.all.js

3455 ms

jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js

jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js

3461 ms

goToTop.js

goToTop.js

3461 ms

functions.js

functions.js

3605 ms

hot1.jpg

hot1.jpg

4489 ms

hot2.jpg

hot2.jpg

3530 ms

hot3.jpg

hot3.jpg

4473 ms

hot4.jpg

hot4.jpg

4475 ms

hot5.jpg

hot5.jpg

3538 ms

hot6.jpg

hot6.jpg

4479 ms

body.png

body.png

3514 ms

bg_pattern.png

bg_pattern.png

4378 ms

stitches.png

stitches.png

4386 ms

logo.png

logo.png

4517 ms

slider_shadow2.png

slider_shadow2.png

4529 ms

body_dotted.png

body_dotted.png

4525 ms

nxtPrev.png

nxtPrev.png

4526 ms

header_pattern.png

header_pattern.png

4457 ms

setting_tools.png

setting_tools.png

4566 ms

lightArrow.png

lightArrow.png

4605 ms

aller_bd-webfont.woff

aller_bd-webfont.woff

4607 ms

small_images_shadow.png

small_images_shadow.png

4617 ms

sprite_social.png

sprite_social.png

4563 ms

totop.png

totop.png

4552 ms

LsJS.aspx

LsJS.aspx

1827 ms

chatnow.gif

chatnow.gif

2761 ms

JS3.aspx

JS3.aspx

713 ms

JS_Float.aspx

JS_Float.aspx

368 ms

circleIco.png

circleIco.png

80 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

159 ms

Accessibility Review

targetg.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

targetg.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

targetg.in SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Targetg.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Targetg.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

targetg.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TargetG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: