Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

tasterschoice.com

Our Instant Coffee Packets, Jars and More | NESCAFÉ® US

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

658 ms

tasterschoice.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tasterschoice.com homepage info - get ready to check Tasterschoice best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tasterschoice.com

There are so many ways to NESCAFÉ! Explore our full variety of beans, blends and roasts to find your coffee moment.

Visit tasterschoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tasterschoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tasterschoice.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,530 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value39.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tasterschoice.com

50 ms

180 ms

ps-widget.js

92 ms

ps-utid.js

105 ms

css_7tMYaFhmCuL9upjidGdYBYNyE85hGRKSpp50DVeAHok.css

364 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tasterschoice.com, 42% (25 requests) were made to Nescafe.com and 15% (9 requests) were made to Service.force.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (487 ms) relates to the external source Nescafe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 575.1 kB (51%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

560.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Tasterschoice.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 626.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 218.2 kB

  • Original 258.2 kB
  • After minification 257.9 kB
  • After compression 40.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 218.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 108 B

  • Original 179.8 kB
  • After minification 179.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tasterschoice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 318.5 kB

  • Original 626.4 kB
  • After minification 626.4 kB
  • After compression 307.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 318.5 kB or 51% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 71.1 kB
  • After minification 70.5 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tasterschoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (63%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tasterschoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tasterschoice.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

tasterschoice.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

tasterschoice.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tasterschoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tasterschoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tasterschoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: