4.1 sec in total
231 ms
3.4 sec
469 ms
Visit tastyworksreview.co now to see the best up-to-date Tastyworks Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tastyworksreview.co
Read our Tastyworks review 2021 & get yourself informed about their pros, trading platforms, accounts, products & more about the $0 commissions platform.
Visit tastyworksreview.coWe analyzed Tastyworksreview.co page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
tastyworksreview.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.14
79/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
231 ms
531 ms
703 ms
30 ms
504 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Tastyworksreview.co, 48% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tastyworksreview.co.
Page size can be reduced by 45.9 kB (39%)
116.5 kB
70.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Tastyworksreview.co main page is 116.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 59.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tastyworks Review images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (33%)
9
6
The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tastyworks Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tastyworksreview.co
231 ms
www.tastyworksreview.co
531 ms
325dbcf6f317eb2761dfe95f7215c66a.css
703 ms
css
30 ms
jquery.min.js
504 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
316 ms
lazyload.min.js
319 ms
28ac36ec8977d78cede0de6d7fc85519.js
1199 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3t-4s51op.ttf
31 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3q-0s51op.ttf
49 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3j-ws51op.ttf
63 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E30-8s51op.ttf
76 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3_-gs51op.ttf
78 ms
7cHpv4kjgoGqM7E_DMs8.ttf
78 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3p-ks51op.ttf
77 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
77 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
75 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
85 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
78 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
86 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
86 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
203 ms
elementskit.woff
1144 ms
iconfont.ttf
641 ms
Account-Opening.png
106 ms
Tastyworks-Reviews-Trading-Platform.png
316 ms
Tastyworks-Reviews-Trading-Fees.png
281 ms
tastyworksreview.co accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tastyworksreview.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tastyworksreview.co SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tastyworksreview.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tastyworksreview.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tastyworksreview.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tastyworks Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: