3.6 sec in total
176 ms
2.8 sec
644 ms
Visit taylorbot.com now to see the best up-to-date Taylorbot content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about taylorbot.com
Learn how to become a digital nomad and find the best places to live and work remotely as a location independent remote worker. Explore places based on cost of living, internet speed, weather and othe...
Visit taylorbot.comWe analyzed Taylorbot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
taylorbot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value33,330 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value42.7 s
0/100
10%
176 ms
1606 ms
79 ms
75 ms
157 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Taylorbot.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Taylorbot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 134.7 kB (14%)
940.2 kB
805.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Taylorbot.com main page is 940.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 812.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Taylorbot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 68.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Taylorbot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (12%)
52
46
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Taylorbot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
taylorbot.com
176 ms
taylorbot.com
1606 ms
font-awesome.css
79 ms
css
75 ms
emoji.css
157 ms
7a98af17e63a0ac09ce2e96d03992fbc-medium.jpg
489 ms
62735316_2SI91y349zpyF0XST1QlCxhg9GTN6bsU7lmhPoXV5_8-720x440.jpg
89 ms
levelsio.jpg
393 ms
zfz4znf.js
139 ms
30638-mWRMJLBnQxe6eInxbdBn-5-360x220.jpg
119 ms
hackernews.png
224 ms
producthunt.png
303 ms
thenextweb.png
369 ms
techcrunch.png
296 ms
medium.png
297 ms
zapier.png
390 ms
123650dd0560587918b3d771cf0c0171-medium.jpg
602 ms
taylorbot.com
144 ms
levelsio-big.jpg
369 ms
bot-bg-1.jpg
425 ms
bot-1.png
272 ms
heart.png
197 ms
angry.png
216 ms
earth_asia.png
270 ms
running.png
272 ms
city_sunrise.png
283 ms
hotel.png
286 ms
computer.png
345 ms
blush.png
346 ms
beers.png
347 ms
balloon.png
358 ms
runner.png
366 ms
car.png
420 ms
star.png
421 ms
moneybag.png
422 ms
dollar.png
433 ms
money_with_wings.png
446 ms
credit_card.png
496 ms
gem.png
497 ms
partly_sunny.png
498 ms
snowflake.png
498 ms
smiley.png
508 ms
relaxed.png
525 ms
ok_hand.png
570 ms
sunglasses.png
572 ms
santa.png
573 ms
grin.png
574 ms
+1.png
584 ms
bot-bg2-1.jpg
582 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
750 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
fbds.js
283 ms
PTezhU41_OoIWScZdfp_KUPrGmOvBm9NjHiubgQZ4IIff5c6EN32IgCjMKM2HMJtgM.woff
32 ms
AsO6kVefTF256tXWJK7x28InPSDiPmlrRJnzwvIdYNbffVA6EN32IgCjMKM2HMJtM3.woff
69 ms
560u_YvLIWykFlNNqrHBZTsvNY3VZN9vWDyD-9ZX4-CffV56EN32IgCjMKM2HMJtMb.woff
109 ms
llvT7SmOgDfrhVHGHcwKuY3yGL1vIfyTmAcxwaGb2b3ff506EN32IgCjMKM2HMJtg6.woff
118 ms
A0kIyqXC2xdAqOGcRLyEX4lSwhMVI1ATZNmGuiK4vUtffVe6EN32IgCjMKM2HMJtg3.woff
131 ms
linkid.js
5 ms
collect
11 ms
p.gif
119 ms
16 ms
taylorbot.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
taylorbot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
taylorbot.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Taylorbot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Taylorbot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
taylorbot.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Taylorbot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: