2.4 sec in total
90 ms
2.2 sec
140 ms
Visit teamitup.com now to see the best up-to-date Teamitup content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about teamitup.com
Visit teamitup.comWe analyzed Teamitup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
teamitup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
99/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value1,520 ms
13/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
90 ms
96 ms
956 ms
764 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Teamitup.com, 24% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (956 ms) belongs to the original domain Teamitup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (82%)
1.5 MB
260.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Teamitup.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Teamitup needs image optimization as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 94% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Teamitup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
10
10
The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Teamitup. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
teamitup.com
90 ms
www.teamitup.com
96 ms
www.teamitup.com
956 ms
application-d1c4ec23090eaf40e627fb2d829273a7.js
764 ms
css
58 ms
landing_v2-f0ac8d3a2af6d086a6e9759a3cb875e2.css
320 ms
css
15 ms
texture-e6012fe6f6deaac8b9b54441a9e88513.png
76 ms
teamitupLogo-a2c7080cb3dc5f6dc183acf155ad8704.png
192 ms
teamitup-logo-lp-6184f639f6a469204ae4826d5af981f5.png
73 ms
ga.js
57 ms
get_coaches
72 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
66 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
74 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
83 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
99 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
teamitup.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
teamitup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
teamitup.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Teamitup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Teamitup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
teamitup.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Teamitup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: