Tools & Wizards About Us
teamofficeclean.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

teamofficeclean.com

Team Office Clean | Commercial & Office Cleaning in Hamilton, Burlington, and Stoney Creek

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

71 ms

teamofficeclean.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Team Office Clean content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about teamofficeclean.com

Providing reliable commercial & office cleaning in Hamilton, Burlington, and Stoney Creek. Book your weekday and weekend cleaning with Team Office Clean. Call for a free quote today.

Visit teamofficeclean.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Teamofficeclean.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

teamofficeclean.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.teamofficeclean.com

132 ms

minified.js

45 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

39 ms

polyfill.min.js

1518 ms

thunderbolt-commons.d9eb8f0e.bundle.min.js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Teamofficeclean.com, 38% (21 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 31% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 706.4 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Teamofficeclean.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 808.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 597.1 kB

  • Original 745.8 kB
  • After minification 744.0 kB
  • After compression 148.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 597.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 100.0 kB

  • Original 808.0 kB
  • After minification 708.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Team Office Clean needs image optimization as it can save up to 100.0 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 257.5 kB
  • After minification 257.5 kB
  • After compression 248.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (32%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Team Office Clean. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.teamofficeclean.com

www.teamofficeclean.com

132 ms

minified.js

minified.js

45 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

39 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1518 ms

thunderbolt-commons.d9eb8f0e.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.d9eb8f0e.bundle.min.js

70 ms

main.f8d4792f.bundle.min.js

main.f8d4792f.bundle.min.js

71 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

31 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

69 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

31 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

73 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

70 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

71 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

112 ms

TOC%20logo%20white.png

TOC%20logo%20white.png

266 ms

19f2c6_63ae3ea7b11048bc85feed6cfe307244~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_63ae3ea7b11048bc85feed6cfe307244~mv2.jpg

455 ms

19f2c6_63192016bed7492e9cadadf08df9758a~mv2.png

19f2c6_63192016bed7492e9cadadf08df9758a~mv2.png

453 ms

image-19-05-23-01-46.jpg

image-19-05-23-01-46.jpg

515 ms

Team%20Office%20Clean%20Google%20Review.png

Team%20Office%20Clean%20Google%20Review.png

417 ms

19f2c6_25fc7b45a7584d609b4d99b2bb56fd3a~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_25fc7b45a7584d609b4d99b2bb56fd3a~mv2.jpg

475 ms

19f2c6_583d5742dd014f578f121caa03ffffed~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_583d5742dd014f578f121caa03ffffed~mv2.jpg

441 ms

19f2c6_1e642f7824ac4b2ab1b78f77f206400e~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_1e642f7824ac4b2ab1b78f77f206400e~mv2.jpg

650 ms

19f2c6_cc99b00942a14d13a57fc4c29b75cd45~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_cc99b00942a14d13a57fc4c29b75cd45~mv2.jpg

613 ms

19f2c6_2e818b57d45d43e690e2e85c7c66a38a~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_2e818b57d45d43e690e2e85c7c66a38a~mv2.jpg

568 ms

19f2c6_2ac3743cc79a4980bca2c6b4752dc476~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_2ac3743cc79a4980bca2c6b4752dc476~mv2.jpg

662 ms

19f2c6_7da8785ff42a4968b93efdf8e04b04e7~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_7da8785ff42a4968b93efdf8e04b04e7~mv2.jpg

689 ms

19f2c6_ca54e16fc67b48ecbf80cc3c0ed27389~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_ca54e16fc67b48ecbf80cc3c0ed27389~mv2.jpg

674 ms

19f2c6_91a5c7b3b93a4200b5b910c72b068f6f~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_91a5c7b3b93a4200b5b910c72b068f6f~mv2.jpg

717 ms

19f2c6_16fc62a834c347538ad10978559841b2~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_16fc62a834c347538ad10978559841b2~mv2.jpg

758 ms

19f2c6_3d53d40fe95e495b8c4d96ab3d708d40~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_3d53d40fe95e495b8c4d96ab3d708d40~mv2.jpg

787 ms

19f2c6_b7908a3f38ac4afaba24cd247174aecc~mv2.jpg

19f2c6_b7908a3f38ac4afaba24cd247174aecc~mv2.jpg

819 ms

19f2c6_70114f4d1d4a42e99d628238ee4c5613~mv2.png

19f2c6_70114f4d1d4a42e99d628238ee4c5613~mv2.png

884 ms

19f2c6_665ec6c35c28494389924eda2edb9d02~mv2.png

19f2c6_665ec6c35c28494389924eda2edb9d02~mv2.png

908 ms

19f2c6_a0e2748cf631430e91666d6e03d831c1~mv2.png

19f2c6_a0e2748cf631430e91666d6e03d831c1~mv2.png

940 ms

TOC%20Reviews.png

TOC%20Reviews.png

832 ms

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

46 ms

AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff

AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff

45 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

45 ms

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

46 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

88 ms

112 ms

108 ms

108 ms

109 ms

108 ms

108 ms

147 ms

145 ms

145 ms

144 ms

145 ms

142 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

7 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

29 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

8 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

8 ms

Accessibility Review

teamofficeclean.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

teamofficeclean.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

teamofficeclean.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Teamofficeclean.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Teamofficeclean.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

teamofficeclean.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Team Office Clean. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: