10.3 sec in total
214 ms
8.3 sec
1.8 sec
Visit tech-bug.com now to see the best up-to-date Tech Bug content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tech-bug.com
TechBug provides you the information, advice & recommendations for spying apps and gadgets at one spot, as well as in-depth Spying app reviews.
Visit tech-bug.comWe analyzed Tech-bug.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
tech-bug.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
214 ms
2339 ms
59 ms
189 ms
287 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Tech-bug.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Tech-bug.com.
Page size can be reduced by 312.1 kB (45%)
690.3 kB
378.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Tech-bug.com main page is 690.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 347.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 299.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 299.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tech Bug images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tech-bug.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (80%)
44
9
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tech Bug. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tech-bug.com
214 ms
www.tech-bug.com
2339 ms
js
59 ms
styles.css
189 ms
style.css
287 ms
style.css
285 ms
css
32 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
380 ms
swiper.min.css
282 ms
post-8122.css
289 ms
post-8756.css
287 ms
tds-front.css
377 ms
td-multipurpose.css
383 ms
style.css
474 ms
td_legacy_main.css
388 ms
tdb_main.css
393 ms
css
47 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
481 ms
jquery.min.js
484 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
492 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
490 ms
lazysizes.min.js
444 ms
index.js
869 ms
index.js
870 ms
ta.js
870 ms
underscore.min.js
870 ms
js_posts_autoload.min.js
871 ms
tagdiv_theme.min.js
874 ms
comment-reply.min.js
871 ms
js_files_for_front.min.js
871 ms
js_files_for_front.min.js
872 ms
float.js
872 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
871 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
872 ms
waypoints.min.js
872 ms
core.min.js
874 ms
frontend.min.js
874 ms
wp-util.min.js
872 ms
frontend.min.js
874 ms
51-1.jpg
3340 ms
www.tech-bug.com
3532 ms
font
83 ms
font
83 ms
font
131 ms
newspaper.woff
236 ms
font
132 ms
newspaper-icons.woff
132 ms
td-multipurpose.ttf
219 ms
font
150 ms
Track-Someones-Location-218x150.jpeg
99 ms
aple-iphone--218x150.jpg
99 ms
tech-bug.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
tech-bug.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
tech-bug.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tech-bug.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tech-bug.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tech-bug.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tech Bug. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: