Tools & Wizards About Us
techdrag.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

techdrag.com

Tech Drag – Your Daily Dose of Technology

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

177 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

432 ms

techdrag.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to techdrag.com homepage info - get ready to check Tech Drag best content right away, or after learning these important things about techdrag.com

Your Daily Dose of Technology

Visit techdrag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Techdrag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

techdrag.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.098

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

techdrag.com

177 ms

M9AvLs9MK9FPLi7WT8zJ0S0uqcxJLdYx1E_JTE_XBRFgKRADLAKWB0pnpZYUJCZngyWhbAA.css

76 ms

M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js

121 ms

M9HPTSzOzyuq1MvNzNMx1i_N1E_OL0pF8MozU9JTSxD8ksSkYhAPAA.js

109 ms

Ky_QTc7PK0nNK9EvLcjJT0wp1i8uz0wr0c1NTM9MhrKzigE.js

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Techdrag.com, 3% (1 request) were made to S0.wp.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Techdrag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 377.1 kB (65%)

Content Size

576.3 kB

After Optimization

199.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Techdrag.com main page is 576.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 264.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 41.1 kB
  • After minification 41.1 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

  • Original 106.7 kB
  • After minification 91.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tech Drag needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 182.2 kB

  • Original 264.0 kB
  • After minification 257.7 kB
  • After compression 81.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 147.6 kB

  • Original 164.5 kB
  • After minification 70.6 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Techdrag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 147.6 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (50%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tech Drag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

techdrag.com

techdrag.com

177 ms

M9AvLs9MK9FPLi7WT8zJ0S0uqcxJLdYx1E_JTE_XBRFgKRADLAKWB0pnpZYUJCZngyWhbAA.css

M9AvLs9MK9FPLi7WT8zJ0S0uqcxJLdYx1E_JTE_XBRFgKRADLAKWB0pnpZYUJCZngyWhbAA.css

76 ms

M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js

M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js

121 ms

M9HPTSzOzyuq1MvNzNMx1i_N1E_OL0pF8MozU9JTSxD8ksSkYhAPAA.js

M9HPTSzOzyuq1MvNzNMx1i_N1E_OL0pF8MozU9JTSxD8ksSkYhAPAA.js

109 ms

Ky_QTc7PK0nNK9EvLcjJT0wp1i8uz0wr0c1NTM9MhrKzigE.js

Ky_QTc7PK0nNK9EvLcjJT0wp1i8uz0wr0c1NTM9MhrKzigE.js

112 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

3 ms

M9EvL9BNzU1KTdHLzcwDAA.js

M9EvL9BNzU1KTdHLzcwDAA.js

102 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

3 ms

style.css

style.css

58 ms

solid-nav.css

solid-nav.css

74 ms

nav-search-solid.css

nav-search-solid.css

72 ms

form-styling.css

form-styling.css

84 ms

table-styling.css

table-styling.css

87 ms

fa-common.css

fa-common.css

82 ms

gradients.css

gradients.css

104 ms

rp-large.css

rp-large.css

116 ms

rp-regular.css

rp-regular.css

126 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

124 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

128 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

83 ms

logo3.png

logo3.png

120 ms

force-close-error-100x100.jpg

force-close-error-100x100.jpg

117 ms

low-interna-memory-warning-100x100.png

low-interna-memory-warning-100x100.png

117 ms

k3-note-heating-issue-solved-100x100.jpg

k3-note-heating-issue-solved-100x100.jpg

118 ms

Xolo-Black-100x100.png

Xolo-Black-100x100.png

117 ms

Pinterest-100x100.jpg

Pinterest-100x100.jpg

118 ms

attrib-example-3-100x100.png

attrib-example-3-100x100.png

119 ms

do_not_crash_addictive_android-100x100.jpg

do_not_crash_addictive_android-100x100.jpg

118 ms

install-facebook-home-on-gingerbread-devices-100x100.jpg

install-facebook-home-on-gingerbread-devices-100x100.jpg

1730 ms

Karbonn-Velox-8-100x100.jpg

Karbonn-Velox-8-100x100.jpg

181 ms

samsung-ativ-s-rear-100x100.jpg

samsung-ativ-s-rear-100x100.jpg

152 ms

galaxy-nexus-running-jelly-bean-36x36.png

galaxy-nexus-running-jelly-bean-36x36.png

148 ms

hp-pavilion-dv6-6119tx-36x36.jpg

hp-pavilion-dv6-6119tx-36x36.jpg

2003 ms

Pinterest-36x36.jpg

Pinterest-36x36.jpg

152 ms

Samsung-Galaxy-II-36x36.jpg

Samsung-Galaxy-II-36x36.jpg

200 ms

Xolo-Black-36x36.png

Xolo-Black-36x36.png

197 ms

g.gif

g.gif

9 ms

Accessibility Review

techdrag.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

techdrag.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

techdrag.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Techdrag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Techdrag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

techdrag.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tech Drag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: