Tools & Wizards About Us
technica.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

technica.co.in

OT Room Furniture Manufacturer,OT Room Table Exporter

Page Load Speed

10.1 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

8.3 sec

Page Rendered

309 ms

technica.co.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to technica.co.in homepage info - get ready to check Technica best content right away, or after learning these important things about technica.co.in

TECHNICA INDIA - Manufacturer,Supplier,Trader of OT Room Furniture, OT Room Table, India best quality OT Room Furniture manufacturers, Send complete requirement detail of OT Room Furniture, OT Room Ta...

Visit technica.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Technica.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

technica.co.in performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.143

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

technica.co.in

1470 ms

www.technica.co.in

2180 ms

intlTelInput.css

24 ms

search.js

27 ms

jquery_ui_main.js

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Technica.co.in, 34% (27 requests) were made to Tiimg.tistatic.com and 28% (22 requests) were made to Cpimg.tistatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Cpimg.tistatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 241.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Technica.co.in main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 230.3 kB

  • Original 300.7 kB
  • After minification 293.3 kB
  • After compression 70.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 230.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 607 B

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Technica images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 174.5 kB
  • After minification 174.5 kB
  • After compression 164.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 507 B

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 14.1 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technica.co.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (43%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

39

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

technica.co.in

technica.co.in

1470 ms

www.technica.co.in

www.technica.co.in

2180 ms

intlTelInput.css

intlTelInput.css

24 ms

search.js

search.js

27 ms

jquery_ui_main.js

jquery_ui_main.js

30 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

28 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

31 ms

slick.css

slick.css

31 ms

js

js

64 ms

js

js

154 ms

js

js

38 ms

css

css

33 ms

wz_tooltip.js

wz_tooltip.js

4 ms

tip_balloon.js

tip_balloon.js

6 ms

theme.js

theme.js

38 ms

intlTelInput.js

intlTelInput.js

6 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

6 ms

request_a_callback.css

request_a_callback.css

6 ms

StaticPopup.css

StaticPopup.css

799 ms

ga.js

ga.js

172 ms

logo_32913.gif

logo_32913.gif

240 ms

template_photo_1.jpg

template_photo_1.jpg

1260 ms

send-inq.png

send-inq.png

158 ms

trusted-seller.svg

trusted-seller.svg

158 ms

nav-divider.png

nav-divider.png

157 ms

search-ico.png

search-ico.png

163 ms

line.jpg

line.jpg

163 ms

icon.png

icon.png

163 ms

left-arrow.png

left-arrow.png

163 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

163 ms

map-bg.png

map-bg.png

187 ms

send_inq_Logo.svg

send_inq_Logo.svg

185 ms

tradeindiamember.gif

tradeindiamember.gif

186 ms

Arrow.png

Arrow.png

185 ms

template_photo_2.jpg

template_photo_2.jpg

2341 ms

template_photo_3.jpg

template_photo_3.jpg

2550 ms

template_photo_4.jpg

template_photo_4.jpg

1712 ms

Femur-Nailing-Support.jpg

Femur-Nailing-Support.jpg

1933 ms

Opthalmic-Operating-Table.jpg

Opthalmic-Operating-Table.jpg

2332 ms

Featel-Testing-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

Featel-Testing-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

1492 ms

Electric-Painless-Delivery-Table.jpg

Electric-Painless-Delivery-Table.jpg

2135 ms

Reverse-Trendelenburg-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

Reverse-Trendelenburg-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

2755 ms

C-Arm-Compatible-Hydraulic-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

C-Arm-Compatible-Hydraulic-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

2610 ms

C-Arm-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

C-Arm-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

2575 ms

Surgery-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

Surgery-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

2339 ms

Beriatric-Bypass-Laproscopic-Surgery-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

Beriatric-Bypass-Laproscopic-Surgery-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

2974 ms

Surgery-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

Surgery-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

2993 ms

Lithotomy-Crutches.jpg

Lithotomy-Crutches.jpg

3384 ms

LED-Surgery-Light.jpg

LED-Surgery-Light.jpg

2806 ms

Fully-Electric-Multi-Position-Painless-Delivery-Table.jpg

Fully-Electric-Multi-Position-Painless-Delivery-Table.jpg

3665 ms

C-Arm-Compatible-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

C-Arm-Compatible-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

2999 ms

Beriatric-Surgery-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

Beriatric-Surgery-Operation-Theatre-Table.jpg

3250 ms

Obstetric-Gynae-Surgery-Table-With-De-Attachable-Mattress.jpg

Obstetric-Gynae-Surgery-Table-With-De-Attachable-Mattress.jpg

3845 ms

C-Arm-Compatible-Hydraulic-OT-Table.jpg

C-Arm-Compatible-Hydraulic-OT-Table.jpg

3000 ms

Operation-Theatre-Table-For-TI-Optima-Selected-Position-Surgeries.jpg

Operation-Theatre-Table-For-TI-Optima-Selected-Position-Surgeries.jpg

3428 ms

up.png

up.png

151 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

160 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

169 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

186 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

186 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

183 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

186 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

186 ms

stemb.gif

stemb.gif

39 ms

stemt.gif

stemt.gif

42 ms

l.gif

l.gif

41 ms

lb.gif

lb.gif

39 ms

b.gif

b.gif

40 ms

rb.gif

rb.gif

41 ms

r.gif

r.gif

41 ms

rt.gif

rt.gif

42 ms

t.gif

t.gif

43 ms

lt.gif

lt.gif

42 ms

background.gif

background.gif

49 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

44 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

24 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

33 ms

Accessibility Review

technica.co.in accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

technica.co.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

technica.co.in SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technica.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Technica.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

technica.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Technica. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: