3.7 sec in total
727 ms
2.5 sec
471 ms
Welcome to technicalblogging.com homepage info - get ready to check Technical Blogging best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about technicalblogging.com
Amplify your influence by sharing your knowledge
Visit technicalblogging.comWe analyzed Technicalblogging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 727 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
technicalblogging.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.176
68/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
727 ms
155 ms
150 ms
152 ms
297 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Technicalblogging.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (727 ms) belongs to the original domain Technicalblogging.com.
Page size can be reduced by 810.3 kB (61%)
1.3 MB
514.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Technicalblogging.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 855.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 136.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Technical Blogging images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 557.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 557.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technicalblogging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (61%)
90
35
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technical Blogging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
technicalblogging.com
727 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
155 ms
widget.css
150 ms
prettify.css
152 ms
style.css
297 ms
styles.css
150 ms
jetpack.css
333 ms
style.css
223 ms
jquery.js
513 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
223 ms
functions.js
225 ms
js-mode.js
307 ms
widgets.js
87 ms
addthis_widget.js
30 ms
output.css
305 ms
prettify.js
370 ms
launch.js
367 ms
jquery.form.min.js
439 ms
scripts.js
368 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
58 ms
gprofiles.js
62 ms
wpgroho.js
399 ms
wp-embed.min.js
439 ms
e-201609.js
4 ms
css
46 ms
css
66 ms
css
83 ms
actb
45 ms
gplus-32.png
83 ms
bg-light.png
284 ms
header.png
542 ms
bg-dark.png
282 ms
inner-cs.png
282 ms
ebay.jpg
283 ms
icon-time.png
282 ms
icon-comments.png
291 ms
federicoclapis-150x150.jpg
291 ms
icon-categories.png
291 ms
icon-tags.png
316 ms
affiliate-network-revenue.jpg
316 ms
abp-150x150.png
381 ms
math-blog-sources-150x150.png
458 ms
calendar.png
379 ms
will-it-blend-150x150.jpg
380 ms
wordpress-permalink-150x150.png
379 ms
video-killed-the-radio-star-150x150.png
529 ms
rss-feed.png
457 ms
actb
274 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
273 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
302 ms
ePnQiV2KRI3kSCEP38mueA.ttf
340 ms
plusone.js
317 ms
list.png
407 ms
footer.png
407 ms
ga.js
238 ms
index.php
512 ms
hovercard.css
84 ms
services.css
99 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
172 ms
300lo.json
85 ms
likebox.php
184 ms
g.gif
44 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
62 ms
actb_largecover.jpg
448 ms
__utm.gif
48 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
26 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
62 ms
fastbutton
146 ms
postmessageRelay
35 ms
roNeOY-tz5Y.css
179 ms
UHhaxo8Cs3k.css
225 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
306 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
364 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
295 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
303 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
58 ms
api.js
44 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
81 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
40 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
20 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
59 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
155 ms
pixel
56 ms
jot
95 ms
pixel
38 ms
nr-852.min.js
249 ms
1972525_725181900845493_1125994143_n.jpg
164 ms
12809786_928594210588709_7064495280858443334_n.jpg
281 ms
1379841_10150004552801901_469209496895221757_n.jpg
290 ms
11825777_1466250310363329_6161288366468631507_n.jpg
326 ms
12509747_1059951547358268_4993914032766995389_n.jpg
332 ms
12472233_863159850471987_8496341122972114305_n.jpg
328 ms
12509012_10208588509892974_6581005288274081955_n.jpg
330 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
47 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
47 ms
4460760967
174 ms
layers.3643cb2e25fb91c29386.js
11 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
42 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
80 ms
technicalblogging.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
technicalblogging.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
technicalblogging.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technicalblogging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Technicalblogging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
technicalblogging.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Technical Blogging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: