Tools & Wizards About Us
technicalfoamservices.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

technicalfoamservices.co.uk

Foam Manufacturer and Converter - Technical Foam Services

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

848 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

657 ms

technicalfoamservices.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit technicalfoamservices.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Technical Foam Services content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about technicalfoamservices.co.uk

Looking for specialist UK foam services? We are an expert foam manufacturer and converter, providing industrial rubber and foam conversion services.

Visit technicalfoamservices.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Technicalfoamservices.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 848 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

technicalfoamservices.co.uk performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.technicalfoamservices.co.uk

848 ms

all.css

169 ms

skype-uri.js

30 ms

gaat-3.1.min.js

527 ms

styles.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Technicalfoamservices.co.uk, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Technicalfoamservices.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (18%)

Content Size

9.0 MB

After Optimization

7.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Technicalfoamservices.co.uk main page is 9.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 152.9 kB

  • Original 193.1 kB
  • After minification 179.7 kB
  • After compression 40.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 152.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 6.7 MB
  • After minification 6.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Technical Foam Services images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 497.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 297.3 kB

  • Original 440.8 kB
  • After minification 424.5 kB
  • After compression 143.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technicalfoamservices.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 297.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (66%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technical Foam Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.technicalfoamservices.co.uk

www.technicalfoamservices.co.uk

848 ms

all.css

all.css

169 ms

skype-uri.js

skype-uri.js

30 ms

gaat-3.1.min.js

gaat-3.1.min.js

527 ms

styles.css

styles.css

182 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

457 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

215 ms

c8d6deb.js

c8d6deb.js

790 ms

css

css

47 ms

icons.css

icons.css

94 ms

normalize2.css

normalize2.css

102 ms

base.css

base.css

139 ms

columns.css

columns.css

184 ms

forms.css

forms.css

190 ms

faders.css

faders.css

235 ms

maps.css

maps.css

273 ms

accordions.css

accordions.css

279 ms

wysiwyg.css

wysiwyg.css

328 ms

main.css

main.css

362 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

40 ms

output.css

output.css

463 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

464 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

467 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

467 ms

api.js

api.js

58 ms

count.js

count.js

467 ms

skype-analytics.js

skype-analytics.js

83 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

78 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

142 ms

logo.png

logo.png

109 ms

avatar_60x60.png

avatar_60x60.png

107 ms

aboutus.jpeg

aboutus.jpeg

1067 ms

whychooseus.jpeg

whychooseus.jpeg

278 ms

designanddevelopment.jpeg

designanddevelopment.jpeg

280 ms

askanexpert.jpeg

askanexpert.jpeg

1066 ms

contactus.jpeg

contactus.jpeg

1065 ms

competitions.png

competitions.png

1117 ms

393852171b7a1b61c023b1a1b3af15d1272b5c93-1.jpeg

393852171b7a1b61c023b1a1b3af15d1272b5c93-1.jpeg

4272 ms

callbutton_24px.png

callbutton_24px.png

39 ms

drodown_icons_10x10.png

drodown_icons_10x10.png

1018 ms

MfmDq4eS7hA

MfmDq4eS7hA

930 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

16 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

837 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

873 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

889 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

888 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

888 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

889 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

collect

collect

879 ms

who.js

who.js

729 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

723 ms

count.js

count.js

568 ms

0657.js

0657.js

156 ms

www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css

www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css

278 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

385 ms

base.js

base.js

614 ms

anchor

anchor

46 ms

who.ashx

who.ashx

284 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

254 ms

layers.173914a8ea2767730b7b.js

layers.173914a8ea2767730b7b.js

318 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

300 ms

-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js

-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js

472 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

496 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

235 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

457 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

467 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

469 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

128 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

39 ms

sh.07f0d9bf220d07a763adad1e.html

sh.07f0d9bf220d07a763adad1e.html

32 ms

Accessibility Review

technicalfoamservices.co.uk accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

technicalfoamservices.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

technicalfoamservices.co.uk SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technicalfoamservices.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Technicalfoamservices.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

technicalfoamservices.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Technical Foam Services. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: