Tools & Wizards About Us
technicat.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

technicat.com

technicat.com

Page Load Speed

994 ms in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

785 ms

Page Rendered

78 ms

technicat.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to technicat.com homepage info - get ready to check Technicat best content right away, or after learning these important things about technicat.com

Website of Technicat LLC

Visit technicat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Technicat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 863 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

technicat.com performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.087

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

technicat.com

131 ms

@technicat

266 ms

fonts-hinted-base.nXqTvl3tOo9dXbn4BRwJAg.css

62 ms

main-base.BRW3HHGP2p3TzqU3zaSfXQ.css

70 ms

main-base.bundle.I-49c63HUIpfsnwfWe06dQ.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Technicat.com, 43% (6 requests) were made to Cdn-static-1.medium.com and 29% (4 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (266 ms) relates to the external source Medium.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 679.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

484.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Technicat.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 688.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 57.3 kB

  • Original 87.5 kB
  • After minification 86.3 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 453 B

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Technicat needs image optimization as it can save up to 453 B or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 246.9 kB

  • Original 384.6 kB
  • After minification 384.6 kB
  • After compression 137.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 246.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 374.9 kB

  • Original 688.3 kB
  • After minification 688.1 kB
  • After compression 313.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technicat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 374.9 kB or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (33%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technicat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

technicat.com

technicat.com

131 ms

@technicat

@technicat

266 ms

fonts-hinted-base.nXqTvl3tOo9dXbn4BRwJAg.css

fonts-hinted-base.nXqTvl3tOo9dXbn4BRwJAg.css

62 ms

main-base.BRW3HHGP2p3TzqU3zaSfXQ.css

main-base.BRW3HHGP2p3TzqU3zaSfXQ.css

70 ms

main-base.bundle.I-49c63HUIpfsnwfWe06dQ.js

main-base.bundle.I-49c63HUIpfsnwfWe06dQ.js

60 ms

icons.eR1AJ_5I759hGrg36Jtvbg.js

icons.eR1AJ_5I759hGrg36Jtvbg.js

45 ms

ga.js

ga.js

241 ms

stat

stat

189 ms

1*cHv932wcST4m1Z5uxt0Ntg.jpeg

1*cHv932wcST4m1Z5uxt0Ntg.jpeg

235 ms

main-common-async.bundle.iBPtwQsCig38LX-xIiU4JQ.js

main-common-async.bundle.iBPtwQsCig38LX-xIiU4JQ.js

11 ms

main-misc-screens.bundle.MfhueK-qj9DI7IrpkESRoA.js

main-misc-screens.bundle.MfhueK-qj9DI7IrpkESRoA.js

7 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

34 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

27 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

28 ms

Accessibility Review

technicat.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

technicat.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

technicat.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technicat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Technicat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

technicat.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Technicat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: