Tools & Wizards About Us
technologyembryo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

technologyembryo.com

Technology News | Latest Tech News Today, New Gadgets, Mobile Technology News - Latest Technology News and Daily Updates, highlights covering Mobile P...

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

137 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

337 ms

technologyembryo.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to technologyembryo.com homepage info - get ready to check Technology Embryo best content right away, or after learning these important things about technologyembryo.com

Home - Get trending tech news, mobile phones, laptops, reviews, software updates, video games, internet and other technology updates on Technology News from India

Visit technologyembryo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Technologyembryo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

technologyembryo.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,800 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.184

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

technologyembryo.com

137 ms

dmedianet.js

173 ms

style.min.css

65 ms

styles.css

108 ms

font-theme.css

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Technologyembryo.com, 22% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Contextual.media.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (495 ms) belongs to the original domain Technologyembryo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 278.6 kB (40%)

Content Size

699.0 kB

After Optimization

420.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Technologyembryo.com main page is 699.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 436.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 137.2 kB

  • Original 158.9 kB
  • After minification 144.3 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 137.8 kB

  • Original 436.8 kB
  • After minification 436.8 kB
  • After compression 299.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 137.8 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 103.3 kB
  • After minification 103.3 kB
  • After compression 99.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technologyembryo.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (94%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technology Embryo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

technologyembryo.com

technologyembryo.com

137 ms

dmedianet.js

dmedianet.js

173 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

65 ms

styles.css

styles.css

108 ms

font-theme.css

font-theme.css

106 ms

style.css

style.css

133 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

38 ms

photoswipe.css

photoswipe.css

142 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

126 ms

reviewer-public.css

reviewer-public.css

133 ms

style.css

style.css

235 ms

reset.css

reset.css

192 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

214 ms

css

css

57 ms

media-queries.css

media-queries.css

198 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

210 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

211 ms

jquery.history.js

jquery.history.js

262 ms

async.min.js

async.min.js

266 ms

tps.js

tps.js

268 ms

main.js

main.js

270 ms

tps-transition-slide.js

tps-transition-slide.js

271 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

62 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

295 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

466 ms

index.js

index.js

466 ms

index.js

index.js

465 ms

ResizeSensor.js

ResizeSensor.js

465 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

465 ms

main.js

main.js

465 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

468 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

467 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

465 ms

jquery.nouislider.all.min.js

jquery.nouislider.all.min.js

466 ms

photoswipe.js

photoswipe.js

467 ms

jquery.knob.js

jquery.knob.js

466 ms

reviewer.public.min.js

reviewer.public.min.js

468 ms

reviewer-reviews-boxes.js

reviewer-reviews-boxes.js

486 ms

reviewer-widget-users-reviews.js

reviewer-widget-users-reviews.js

495 ms

api.js

api.js

111 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

40 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

484 ms

retina.js

retina.js

434 ms

jquery.infinitescroll.min.js

jquery.infinitescroll.min.js

395 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

396 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

446 ms

index.js

index.js

429 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

418 ms

flping.php

flping.php

315 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

31 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff

63 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

80 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

83 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

82 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

80 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

138 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

82 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

80 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

83 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

85 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

86 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

84 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrm_dSb_.woff

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrm_dSb_.woff

86 ms

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy3Vp8NA.woff

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy3Vp8NA.woff

84 ms

Accessibility Review

technologyembryo.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

technologyembryo.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

technologyembryo.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technologyembryo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Technologyembryo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

technologyembryo.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: