Tools & Wizards About Us
technologyevaluation.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

technologyevaluation.com

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

331 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

technologyevaluation.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Technologyevaluation content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about technologyevaluation.com

We help companies like yours research, evaluate, and select the best enterprise software solutions for their unique business requirements.

Visit technologyevaluation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Technologyevaluation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 331 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

technologyevaluation.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,680 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

technologyevaluation.com

331 ms

www.technologyevaluation.com

930 ms

bootstrap.min.css

10 ms

jquery.min.js

110 ms

bootstrap.min.js

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Technologyevaluation.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (930 ms) belongs to the original domain Technologyevaluation.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 428.4 kB (49%)

Content Size

869.2 kB

After Optimization

440.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Technologyevaluation.com main page is 869.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 344.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 53.3 kB

  • Original 66.0 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 45.1 kB

  • Original 344.0 kB
  • After minification 298.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Technologyevaluation needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 139.1 kB

  • Original 212.4 kB
  • After minification 205.9 kB
  • After compression 73.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 190.9 kB

  • Original 246.7 kB
  • After minification 245.1 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technologyevaluation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 190.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (45%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technologyevaluation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

technologyevaluation.com

technologyevaluation.com

331 ms

www.technologyevaluation.com

www.technologyevaluation.com

930 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

10 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

110 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

107 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

331 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

286 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

317 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

284 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

207 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

187 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

224 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

299 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

94 ms

atrk.gif

atrk.gif

213 ms

test.png

test.png

300 ms

Explore-and-compare.png

Explore-and-compare.png

109 ms

Get-buyers-guides.png

Get-buyers-guides.png

109 ms

Get-a-short-list.png

Get-a-short-list.png

109 ms

Download-templates.png

Download-templates.png

108 ms

Read-software-reviews.png

Read-software-reviews.png

181 ms

Browse-solutions.png

Browse-solutions.png

293 ms

Download-reports.png

Download-reports.png

293 ms

Need-advice.png

Need-advice.png

266 ms

Customer-Relationship-Management-(CRM)_3.aspx

Customer-Relationship-Management-(CRM)_3.aspx

294 ms

Business-Intelligence-and-Data-Managment_6.aspx

Business-Intelligence-and-Data-Managment_6.aspx

376 ms

Enterprise-Resource-Planning-(ERP)_2.aspx

Enterprise-Resource-Planning-(ERP)_2.aspx

367 ms

Human-Capital-Managment-(HCM)_4.aspx

Human-Capital-Managment-(HCM)_4.aspx

444 ms

Cover-ERP-(2).aspx

Cover-ERP-(2).aspx

754 ms

SyenrgyCover2.aspx

SyenrgyCover2.aspx

651 ms

dd_arrow.gif

dd_arrow.gif

373 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

370 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

462 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

470 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

469 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

467 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

17 ms

88286074-156e-46e5-831d-0212af478bd0.png

88286074-156e-46e5-831d-0212af478bd0.png

309 ms

Home_Slide_3.jpg

Home_Slide_3.jpg

454 ms

c1a2bc01-9ed2-43c1-be2f-296ce54c44f6.png

c1a2bc01-9ed2-43c1-be2f-296ce54c44f6.png

264 ms

01cba3cd-f813-4d76-b2b3-c598d713bd15.png

01cba3cd-f813-4d76-b2b3-c598d713bd15.png

270 ms

1442a38b-5cfd-4ace-84d9-a9aea539bb50.png

1442a38b-5cfd-4ace-84d9-a9aea539bb50.png

197 ms

06d9dd2d-3f94-4b01-b543-f5f12c37474d.jpg

06d9dd2d-3f94-4b01-b543-f5f12c37474d.jpg

334 ms

11bb545b-8773-4ef8-875b-c80e714ae398.jpg

11bb545b-8773-4ef8-875b-c80e714ae398.jpg

329 ms

6509.js

6509.js

121 ms

ga.js

ga.js

124 ms

153515f1-9531-470f-9396-a534cad096fc_162_210.jpg

153515f1-9531-470f-9396-a534cad096fc_162_210.jpg

261 ms

d5349ad1-e20b-47fd-8dca-37f146030ecf_210_128.png

d5349ad1-e20b-47fd-8dca-37f146030ecf_210_128.png

265 ms

Menu_home.png

Menu_home.png

185 ms

Menu_Arrow.png

Menu_Arrow.png

179 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

52 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

26 ms

collect

collect

55 ms

Accessibility Review

technologyevaluation.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

technologyevaluation.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

technologyevaluation.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technologyevaluation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Technologyevaluation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

technologyevaluation.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Technologyevaluation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: