4.4 sec in total
604 ms
3.1 sec
738 ms
Welcome to technologyvsseo.com homepage info - get ready to check Technologyvsseo best content right away, or after learning these important things about technologyvsseo.com
Visit technologyvsseo.comWe analyzed Technologyvsseo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 604 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
technologyvsseo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.5 s
38/100
25%
Value4.6 s
70/100
10%
Value440 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value4.2 s
85/100
10%
604 ms
202 ms
29 ms
129 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Technologyvsseo.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Yceml.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (981 ms) relates to the external source Bestvpn.co.
Page size can be reduced by 633.5 kB (67%)
942.9 kB
309.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Technologyvsseo.com main page is 942.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 552.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Technologyvsseo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 79.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.7 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 469.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technologyvsseo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 469.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (65%)
71
25
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technologyvsseo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
computersecurity.org
604 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
202 ms
css
29 ms
style.min.css
129 ms
vendors-style.css
134 ms
style.css
385 ms
frontend.css
134 ms
sfsi-style.css
265 ms
woocommerce_refund_and_exchange_lite-public.css
195 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
260 ms
woocommerce.css
325 ms
unsemantic-grid.min.css
253 ms
style.min.css
261 ms
mobile.min.css
317 ms
font-awesome.min.css
378 ms
style.css
319 ms
jetpack.css
385 ms
jquery.js
501 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
384 ms
woocommerce_refund_and_exchange_lite-public.js
399 ms
s-202044.js
34 ms
adsbygoogle.js
57 ms
counter.js
59 ms
public.js
399 ms
core.min.js
402 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
405 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
416 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
417 ms
custom.js
492 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
601 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
602 ms
js.cookie.min.js
605 ms
woocommerce.min.js
605 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
606 ms
mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js
600 ms
menu.min.js
602 ms
a11y.min.js
601 ms
back-to-top.min.js
601 ms
new-tab.js
601 ms
validate.js
777 ms
e-202044.js
3 ms
wp-embed.min.js
777 ms
9g117fz2rxvGOPLLLLJGIKPQKQKJ
383 ms
NordVPN-Free-Trial-1.jpg
981 ms
mstile-310x310.png
545 ms
sp114uuymsqBJKGGGGEBDFLLLKKK
616 ms
br101xjnbhf08955553024712244
635 ms
activity-medium2.png
687 ms
cute_rss.png
297 ms
cute_email.png
296 ms
cute_facebook.png
297 ms
bot_tip_icn.png
297 ms
fbshare_bck.png
541 ms
cute_twitter.png
541 ms
en_US_Tweet.svg
541 ms
cropped-logo-2.png
770 ms
premium.jpg
696 ms
download-1-1.jpg
696 ms
download-2.jpg
700 ms
ps2-300x248.jpg
771 ms
rss.png
542 ms
world.png
540 ms
show_ads_impl.js
389 ms
zrt_lookup.html
580 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df2MHGeHmmZ.ttf
397 ms
0ybgGDoxxrvAnPhYGzMlQLzuMasz6Df213aeHmmZ.ttf
487 ms
generatepress.woff
280 ms
t.php
488 ms
sdk.js
332 ms
13893932-1595962359059
333 ms
13893922-1595962308897
337 ms
computersecurity.org
575 ms
cookie.js
276 ms
integrator.js
176 ms
ads
166 ms
osd.js
165 ms
sdk.js
103 ms
N
199 ms
13601133-1598918065845
5 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
67 ms
sodar
49 ms
technologyvsseo.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
technologyvsseo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
technologyvsseo.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technologyvsseo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Technologyvsseo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
technologyvsseo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Technologyvsseo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: