1.7 sec in total
187 ms
1.4 sec
102 ms
Click here to check amazing Tech Packets content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about techpackets.com
Useful Technology Guides for Computer Users
Visit techpackets.comWe analyzed Techpackets.com page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
techpackets.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
187 ms
65 ms
83 ms
78 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Techpackets.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to I2.wp.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (887 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 463.2 kB (60%)
768.5 kB
305.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Techpackets.com main page is 768.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 436.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tech Packets images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 298.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Techpackets.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (80%)
71
14
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tech Packets. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
techpackets.com
187 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
65 ms
widget.css
83 ms
wptouch-icons.css
78 ms
css
25 ms
pushit.css
91 ms
style.css
94 ms
style.css
109 ms
styles.css
131 ms
colorbox.css
123 ms
polls-css.css
129 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
142 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
159 ms
default.min.css
165 ms
tipsy.css
171 ms
wp-shortcode.css
168 ms
jetpack.css
180 ms
jquery.js
257 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
220 ms
jquery.form.min.js
223 ms
puzzle_reload.js
230 ms
solvemedia_comment_reply.js
222 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
246 ms
spin.js
300 ms
jquery.spin.js
274 ms
tiled-gallery.js
341 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
285 ms
wp-shortcode.js
299 ms
solvemedia.css
298 ms
bauhaus.js
320 ms
spin.min.js
325 ms
spin-jquery.js
377 ms
menu.js
378 ms
base.js
377 ms
base-public.js
379 ms
google-fonts.js
388 ms
load-more.js
398 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
61 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
fluid-width-videos.js
401 ms
media.js
370 ms
tappable.min.js
350 ms
wptouch.tappable.js
349 ms
wptouch.fastclick.js
352 ms
fastclick.min.js
355 ms
pushit.js
349 ms
wptouch.js
373 ms
wp-external-links.js
348 ms
photon.js
374 ms
scripts.js
347 ms
polls-js.js
350 ms
jetpack-carousel.js
363 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
386 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
363 ms
ga.js
7 ms
wpgroho.js
365 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
Click-on-Erase-Button.png
801 ms
Drive-List-after-Sweeping-Data.jpg
887 ms
Oaxis-Bento-Induction-Speaker.jpg
533 ms
Paper.png
249 ms
tech-packets-logo.png
248 ms
Teewe-Dongle-Review-Giveaway.png
861 ms
Erase-Free-Space.png
553 ms
OX-X-Installation-on-New-SSD.jpg
732 ms
Replacing-Hard-Drive-with-SSD-on-Mac.jpg
858 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
8 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
16 ms
wptouch-icons.woff
225 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
16 ms
1pO9eUAp8pSF8VnRTP3xnvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
16 ms
t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
16 ms
count.js
46 ms
hovercard.css
29 ms
services.css
53 ms
overlay.png
79 ms
g.gif
4 ms
techpackets.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
techpackets.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
techpackets.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Techpackets.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Techpackets.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
techpackets.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tech Packets. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: