5 sec in total
95 ms
3.2 sec
1.7 sec
Visit techreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about techreview.com
Emerging technology news & insights | AI, Climate Change, BioTech, and more
Visit techreview.comWe analyzed Techreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
techreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value3,470 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.175
68/100
15%
Value22.3 s
1/100
10%
95 ms
323 ms
61 ms
47 ms
150 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Techreview.com, 50% (56 requests) were made to D267cvn3rvuq91.cloudfront.net and 5% (5 requests) were made to Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (701 ms) relates to the external source D267cvn3rvuq91.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 566.6 kB (29%)
1.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Techreview.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tech Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 417.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 417.8 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (55%)
96
43
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
techreview.com
95 ms
www.technologyreview.com
323 ms
global.min.css
61 ms
home.min.css
47 ms
app.min.js
150 ms
boardvantage_x108.png
619 ms
tanium_logo_color_5000X1000.png
568 ms
gtm.js
606 ms
stacked-logo.svg
554 ms
angle-arrow.svg
556 ms
angle-arrow--red.svg
557 ms
mag-small.svg
565 ms
fanucx2760.jpg
587 ms
angle-arrow--white.svg
562 ms
junex2100.jpg
587 ms
ubix2000.jpg
585 ms
ma16coverfordigital.jpg
587 ms
arrow--white.svg
581 ms
warrantproofx2760.jpg
601 ms
theclimbx1900_0.jpg
597 ms
wristx2760_0.jpg
593 ms
arrow.svg
587 ms
whatsappx2760.jpg
592 ms
hannigan.qax1398.jpg
596 ms
foodporn.png
599 ms
br.online.cover_hires_2.jpg
620 ms
emtech-digital-logo.svg
607 ms
applex2760_0.jpg
623 ms
radiative.jpg
624 ms
fukushima.jpg
620 ms
8ix2760.jpg
684 ms
smarthouse.twitterx2000.jpg
677 ms
wechat.1x2760.jpg
624 ms
palmerx2760_0.jpg
678 ms
alivecorwatch.jpg
678 ms
drinking-and-tweeting.png
701 ms
batteryx650_0.jpg
685 ms
bitcoin.bankx2760.jpg
692 ms
french.assemblyx2760.jpg
692 ms
charlottecop.jpg
697 ms
ai.doctorx2760.jpg
694 ms
sunedison.jpg
695 ms
nhaasgroteskdsstd-65md.woff
691 ms
nhaasgroteskdsstd-75bd.woff
178 ms
nhaasgroteskdsstd-95blk.woff
155 ms
nhaasgroteskdsstd-55rg.woff
157 ms
nhaasgroteskdsstd-45lt.woff
157 ms
nhaasgroteskdsstd-35xlt.woff
137 ms
nhaasgroteskdsstd-25th.woff
137 ms
nhaasgroteskdsstd-15ultth.woff
127 ms
font-bureau-millerdisplay-bold.woff
129 ms
font-bureau-millerdisplay-semibold.woff
127 ms
font-bureau-millerdisplay-roman.woff
130 ms
font-bureau-millerdisplay-light.woff
127 ms
v-sign.png
128 ms
social-icon--twitter.svg
121 ms
social-icon--facebook.svg
121 ms
social-icon--rss.svg
129 ms
tr-glyph.svg
124 ms
horizontal-logo--white.svg
123 ms
plus--white.svg
110 ms
analytics.js
271 ms
insight.min.js
319 ms
quant.js
307 ms
p.js
289 ms
esf.js
302 ms
linkid.js
20 ms
ec.js
27 ms
technologyreview.com
62 ms
collect
45 ms
collect
108 ms
pixel;r=1556190385;a=p-ffE9vWW7lzZG-;labels=;fpan=1;fpa=P0-672394560-1458288631692;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458288631689;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.technologyreview.com%2F;ogl=title.MIT%20Technology%20Review%2Cdescription.The%20mission%20of%20MIT%20Technology%20Review%20is%20to%20equip%20its%20audiences%20with%20the%20intellig%2Ctype.website%2Csite_name.MIT%20Technology%20Review%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Etechnologyreview%252Ecom%2F%2Cimage%3Aurl.%2F_%2Fimg%2Fmittr-social-logo%252Ejpg%2Cimage%3Atype.%2Cimage%3Awidth.1200%2Cimage%3Aheight.630
94 ms
;ord=1458288631719
99 ms
ptrack-v0.4.10-engaged-time.js
27 ms
55 ms
ga-audiences
68 ms
bcn
361 ms
gpt.js
59 ms
collect
10 ms
7 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
34 ms
ads
101 ms
container.html
51 ms
dvbs_src.js
97 ms
moatad.js
201 ms
ads
50 ms
osd.js
187 ms
aclk
186 ms
ads
110 ms
bst2tv3.html
128 ms
verify.js
181 ms
aclk
177 ms
ads
99 ms
15932874730389222939
138 ms
pixel.gif
261 ms
ads
150 ms
148 ms
adServer.bs
286 ms
dt
196 ms
aclk
98 ms
dt
194 ms
aclk
90 ms
dtc
112 ms
5862910793164341008
85 ms
express_html_inpage_rendering_lib_200_119.js
175 ms
l
115 ms
modernizr_2.8.3_ec185bb44fe5e6bf7455d6e8ef37ed0e_no-classes.js
115 ms
lidar.js
26 ms
dtc
49 ms
pixel.gif
47 ms
pixel.gif
60 ms
techreview.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
techreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
techreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Techreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Techreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
techreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: