Tools & Wizards About Us
techsac.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

techsac.in

Industrial Boards, Embedded Boards,Single Board Computers, ARM Board

Page Load Speed

11.4 sec in total

First Response

3.8 sec

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

techsac.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to techsac.in homepage info - get ready to check Techsac best content right away, or after learning these important things about techsac.in

Industrial Boards, Embedded Boards,Single Board Computers, ARM Board, Computer on Modules, ARM SBC, ARM CPU Modules, Panel PC

Visit techsac.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Techsac.in page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

techsac.in performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.314

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

techsac.in

3768 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

488 ms

style.min.css

983 ms

font-awesome.min.css

756 ms

styles.css

558 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Techsac.in, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Techsac.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (41%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Techsac.in main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 63.2 kB
  • After minification 59.5 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 88.8 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Techsac images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 825.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 415.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 825.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 456.8 kB

  • Original 572.8 kB
  • After minification 562.2 kB
  • After compression 115.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Techsac.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 456.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (68%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Techsac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

techsac.in

techsac.in

3768 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

488 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

983 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

756 ms

styles.css

styles.css

558 ms

ksp.css

ksp.css

1127 ms

style.css

style.css

731 ms

style.css

style.css

754 ms

style.css

style.css

835 ms

style.css

style.css

973 ms

style.css

style.css

1020 ms

style.css

style.css

1007 ms

virtue.css

virtue.css

2225 ms

default.css

default.css

1216 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

39 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

1472 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1511 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1286 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

921 ms

api.js

api.js

47 ms

script.js

script.js

971 ms

ksp-min.js

ksp-min.js

1330 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

1203 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

1214 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

1231 ms

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

1274 ms

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

1485 ms

script.js

script.js

1457 ms

script.js

script.js

1476 ms

script.js

script.js

1526 ms

client.js

client.js

1595 ms

bootstrap-min.js

bootstrap-min.js

1700 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

2212 ms

select2-min.js

select2-min.js

2328 ms

main.js

main.js

1846 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1865 ms

e-202428.js

e-202428.js

23 ms

T35.png

T35.png

245 ms

T34.png

T34.png

281 ms

F4.jpg

F4.jpg

807 ms

F3.jpg

F3.jpg

1934 ms

F2.jpg

F2.jpg

973 ms

F1.jpg

F1.jpg

846 ms

EMB-BSW1-1-300x200.jpg

EMB-BSW1-1-300x200.jpg

742 ms

Modular-HMI-Panel-PC-300x200.jpg

Modular-HMI-Panel-PC-300x200.jpg

837 ms

66b9cc98-47b3-45b8-8242-a49e3236f5ad-300x300.jpg

66b9cc98-47b3-45b8-8242-a49e3236f5ad-300x300.jpg

916 ms

BOXER-6313-sec-300x200.jpg

BOXER-6313-sec-300x200.jpg

1009 ms

Invehicle-Computer.jpg

Invehicle-Computer.jpg

1117 ms

eB1.0-bill-industry-211x300.jpg

eB1.0-bill-industry-211x300.jpg

1116 ms

NET-SAM9X25-300x182.jpg

NET-SAM9X25-300x182.jpg

1162 ms

20151117083438-300x300.png

20151117083438-300x300.png

1215 ms

pl12084025-76_ppi_pixel_density_7_auo_lcd_panel_flat_panel_lcd_display_up070w01_1_for_commercial_use-300x215.jpg

pl12084025-76_ppi_pixel_density_7_auo_lcd_panel_flat_panel_lcd_display_up070w01_1_for_commercial_use-300x215.jpg

1263 ms

virtue_icons.ttf

virtue_icons.ttf

1339 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

13 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

18 ms

kt-slider.ttf

kt-slider.ttf

1345 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

29 ms

anchor

anchor

91 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

14 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

17 ms

QR5Eh00-DY-sP8PcJ5iIzhz00opxPFI30kmgY8y9GnU.js

QR5Eh00-DY-sP8PcJ5iIzhz00opxPFI30kmgY8y9GnU.js

61 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

56 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

42 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

55 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

55 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

61 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

43 ms

Accessibility Review

techsac.in accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

techsac.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

techsac.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Techsac.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Techsac.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

techsac.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Techsac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: