9 sec in total
821 ms
7.3 sec
896 ms
Visit tectix.in now to see the best up-to-date TECTIX content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tectix.in
TECTIX Events and Brand solutions. we believe in fueling the growth of your business by offering a wide-range of interactive technological solutions.Experiential marketing & event solutions, Interacti...
Visit tectix.inWe analyzed Tectix.in page load time and found that the first response time was 821 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
tectix.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value16.6 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.702
7/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
821 ms
1064 ms
527 ms
1053 ms
791 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Tectix.in, 4% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Tectix.in.
Page size can be reduced by 258.8 kB (14%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Tectix.in main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.7 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TECTIX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 133.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 133.1 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tectix.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (31%)
74
51
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TECTIX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tectix.in
821 ms
tectix.in
1064 ms
bootstrap.css
527 ms
style.css
1053 ms
responsive.css
791 ms
all.css
29 ms
css2
40 ms
color-switcher-design.css
806 ms
tectix_logo.svg
822 ms
about-img-1.jpg
1113 ms
qr_code.png
832 ms
vr-ar.png
1064 ms
gesture_based.png
1075 ms
sensor_based.png
1098 ms
360.png
1111 ms
facial_recognition_system.png
1316 ms
virtual_events.png
1318 ms
speaker-1.jpg
1615 ms
speaker-2.jpg
1373 ms
speaker-3.jpg
1665 ms
speaker-4.jpg
1394 ms
jquery.js
1584 ms
popper.min.js
1579 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1650 ms
jquery-ui.js
2235 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1850 ms
appear.js
1848 ms
owl.js
1888 ms
jquery.countdown.js
1929 ms
wow.js
1944 ms
script.js
2114 ms
color-settings.js
2114 ms
campaign_executed.png
2160 ms
cities.png
2203 ms
happy.png
2223 ms
3.jpg
2638 ms
1.png
2379 ms
2.png
2432 ms
3.png
2479 ms
4.png
2502 ms
5.png
1991 ms
6.png
1858 ms
7.png
1904 ms
8.png
1937 ms
9.png
1957 ms
css
17 ms
fontawesome-all.css
1739 ms
flaticon.css
1845 ms
elegent-icon.css
1836 ms
animate.css
1884 ms
swiper.css
1926 ms
owl.css
1956 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
1768 ms
10.png
1935 ms
11.png
1879 ms
12.png
1872 ms
news-1.jpg
1736 ms
news-2.jpg
1765 ms
news-3.jpg
1752 ms
tectix_footer_logo.svg
1860 ms
gw-1.jpg
1845 ms
gw-2.jpg
1684 ms
gw-3.jpg
1737 ms
gw-4.jpg
1741 ms
gw-5.jpg
1717 ms
gw-6.jpg
1828 ms
circle-blue.png
932 ms
icon-dots.png
695 ms
icon-circle-1.png
761 ms
shape-2.png
806 ms
twist-line-1.png
823 ms
twist-line-2.png
936 ms
twist-line-3.png
967 ms
pattern-1.jpg
1309 ms
1.jpg
1911 ms
icon-dots-2.png
1102 ms
icon-dots-3.png
1195 ms
9.jpg
1200 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf
112 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf
138 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf
138 ms
Flaticon.svg
1189 ms
Flaticon.woff
1329 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
1410 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
97 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1416 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
111 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1461 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
109 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1532 ms
1.jpg
1797 ms
2.jpg
1843 ms
Flaticon.ttf
336 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
305 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
337 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
398 ms
fa-brands-400.svg
275 ms
fa-solid-900.svg
278 ms
fa-regular-400.svg
265 ms
tectix.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tectix.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tectix.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tectix.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tectix.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tectix.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TECTIX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: