9.2 sec in total
771 ms
7.6 sec
884 ms
Visit tectix.in now to see the best up-to-date TECTIX content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tectix.in
TECTIX Events and Brand solutions. we believe in fueling the growth of your business by offering a wide-range of interactive technological solutions.Experiential marketing & event solutions, Interacti...
Visit tectix.inWe analyzed Tectix.in page load time and found that the first response time was 771 ms and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
tectix.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.702
7/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
771 ms
1080 ms
532 ms
1059 ms
803 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Tectix.in, 4% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Tectix.in.
Page size can be reduced by 195.6 kB (11%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Tectix.in main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.7 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TECTIX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 69.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.9 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tectix.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (31%)
74
51
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TECTIX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tectix.in
771 ms
tectix.in
1080 ms
bootstrap.css
532 ms
style.css
1059 ms
responsive.css
803 ms
all.css
32 ms
css2
38 ms
color-switcher-design.css
808 ms
tectix_logo.svg
851 ms
about-img-1.jpg
1069 ms
qr_code.png
822 ms
vr-ar.png
1081 ms
gesture_based.png
1082 ms
sensor_based.png
1113 ms
360.png
1151 ms
facial_recognition_system.png
1315 ms
virtual_events.png
1373 ms
speaker-1.jpg
1670 ms
speaker-2.jpg
1665 ms
speaker-3.jpg
1412 ms
speaker-4.jpg
1696 ms
jquery.js
1850 ms
popper.min.js
1639 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1694 ms
jquery-ui.js
2445 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
2190 ms
appear.js
1942 ms
owl.js
1957 ms
jquery.countdown.js
1963 ms
wow.js
2115 ms
script.js
2212 ms
color-settings.js
2221 ms
campaign_executed.png
2224 ms
cities.png
2375 ms
happy.png
2445 ms
3.jpg
2744 ms
1.png
2517 ms
2.png
2498 ms
3.png
2650 ms
4.png
2706 ms
5.png
2180 ms
6.png
1980 ms
7.png
1989 ms
8.png
2100 ms
9.png
2117 ms
css
16 ms
fontawesome-all.css
1921 ms
flaticon.css
1952 ms
elegent-icon.css
1975 ms
animate.css
2000 ms
swiper.css
2171 ms
owl.css
2139 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
1975 ms
10.png
2000 ms
11.png
1960 ms
12.png
1732 ms
news-1.jpg
1887 ms
news-2.jpg
1902 ms
news-3.jpg
1856 ms
tectix_footer_logo.svg
1895 ms
gw-1.jpg
1782 ms
gw-2.jpg
1702 ms
gw-3.jpg
1847 ms
gw-4.jpg
1842 ms
gw-5.jpg
1694 ms
gw-6.jpg
1662 ms
circle-blue.png
856 ms
icon-dots.png
596 ms
icon-circle-1.png
752 ms
shape-2.png
757 ms
twist-line-1.png
765 ms
twist-line-2.png
803 ms
twist-line-3.png
853 ms
pattern-1.jpg
1281 ms
1.jpg
1800 ms
icon-dots-2.png
1025 ms
icon-dots-3.png
1064 ms
9.jpg
1371 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCM.woff
129 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCM.woff
177 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCM.woff
177 ms
Flaticon.svg
1057 ms
Flaticon.woff
1228 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
1539 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
111 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1320 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
126 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1480 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
157 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1494 ms
1.jpg
2247 ms
2.jpg
1751 ms
Flaticon.ttf
497 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
426 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
296 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
487 ms
fa-brands-400.svg
261 ms
fa-solid-900.svg
262 ms
fa-regular-400.svg
264 ms
tectix.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tectix.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tectix.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tectix.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tectix.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tectix.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TECTIX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: