Tools & Wizards About Us
teknikdebatt.se screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

teknikdebatt.se

Ingenjörsjobb - Lediga jobb för ingenjörer | Ingenjorsjobb.se

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

505 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

988 ms

teknikdebatt.se screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Teknikdebatt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about teknikdebatt.se

Hitta lediga ingenjörsjobb i hela Sverige. Vi hjälper dig när du vill ta nästa steg i din ingenjörskarriär. Hitta drömjobbet som ingenjör hos ingenjörsjobb.se!

Visit teknikdebatt.se

Key Findings

We analyzed Teknikdebatt.se page load time and found that the first response time was 505 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

teknikdebatt.se performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,540 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

teknikdebatt.se

505 ms

www.ingenjorsjobb.se

124 ms

www.ingenjorsjobb.se

173 ms

ingenjorsjobb.se

108 ms

ingenjorsjobb.se

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Teknikdebatt.se, 28% (13 requests) were made to Ingenjorsjobb.se and 21% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 92.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Teknikdebatt.se main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 23.8 kB
  • After minification 18.7 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 41.6 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Teknikdebatt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 67.5 kB
  • After minification 67.5 kB
  • After compression 35.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 162 B

  • Original 44.5 kB
  • After minification 44.5 kB
  • After compression 44.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Teknikdebatt.se has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (38%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Teknikdebatt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

teknikdebatt.se

teknikdebatt.se

505 ms

www.ingenjorsjobb.se

www.ingenjorsjobb.se

124 ms

www.ingenjorsjobb.se

www.ingenjorsjobb.se

173 ms

ingenjorsjobb.se

ingenjorsjobb.se

108 ms

ingenjorsjobb.se

ingenjorsjobb.se

165 ms

css2

css2

138 ms

css

css

150 ms

ingenjorsjobb.css

ingenjorsjobb.css

13 ms

asyncjs.php

asyncjs.php

989 ms

app.js

app.js

124 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

417 ms

ingenjorsjobb-stacked.png

ingenjorsjobb-stacked.png

802 ms

TNWDYkLEdPtLIKQ9nhiQZpZKBEPLThIIUKizJcWO.png

TNWDYkLEdPtLIKQ9nhiQZpZKBEPLThIIUKizJcWO.png

497 ms

qDi1ntEW4wcIcpAuCiyxpIQfqAXxFvsB2mt3hBwj.png

qDi1ntEW4wcIcpAuCiyxpIQfqAXxFvsB2mt3hBwj.png

327 ms

OwZmvVJWC3eku0eXH4zNMzPgaAoPC6TyweBXFKsg.jpg

OwZmvVJWC3eku0eXH4zNMzPgaAoPC6TyweBXFKsg.jpg

325 ms

KQ8L30bWBipxxCzDlrl3P3ywEWTB1hVw6j3EhOwB.jpeg

KQ8L30bWBipxxCzDlrl3P3ywEWTB1hVw6j3EhOwB.jpeg

495 ms

nmSt9uPM8rVZZY9vViYsQtdQDMmKMB9ko9lUzvik.jpg

nmSt9uPM8rVZZY9vViYsQtdQDMmKMB9ko9lUzvik.jpg

327 ms

J7aenpF2V0Erg4Y5k5Y4.ttf

J7aenpF2V0Erg4Y5k5Y4.ttf

755 ms

J7aTnpF2V0EjcKUp.ttf

J7aTnpF2V0EjcKUp.ttf

892 ms

J7aenpF2V0Ery4A5k5Y4.ttf

J7aenpF2V0Ery4A5k5Y4.ttf

1141 ms

va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VfkA.ttf

va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VfkA.ttf

1041 ms

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnZKvuQQ.ttf

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnZKvuQQ.ttf

1265 ms

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3uQQ.ttf

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3uQQ.ttf

1266 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

201 ms

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuyJG.ttf

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuyJG.ttf

1265 ms

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787wsuyJG.ttf

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787wsuyJG.ttf

1141 ms

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vCJG.ttf

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vCJG.ttf

1267 ms

0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-MoFkqg.ttf

0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-MoFkqg.ttf

1286 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

213 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

298 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

268 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

543 ms

bat.js

bat.js

407 ms

hotjar-2413309.js

hotjar-2413309.js

625 ms

v.js

v.js

631 ms

collect

collect

208 ms

654 ms

identity.js

identity.js

163 ms

2714947008800265

2714947008800265

311 ms

collect

collect

533 ms

modules.2be88a2123e5e486752f.js

modules.2be88a2123e5e486752f.js

329 ms

usersync

usersync

541 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

155 ms

162 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

168 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

393 ms

23 ms

Accessibility Review

teknikdebatt.se accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

teknikdebatt.se best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

teknikdebatt.se SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    SV

  • Language Claimed

    SV

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Teknikdebatt.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Teknikdebatt.se main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

teknikdebatt.se

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Teknikdebatt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: