7 sec in total
403 ms
6.1 sec
473 ms
Welcome to telemagic.no homepage info - get ready to check Telemagic best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about telemagic.no
Telemagic Group delivers specialized and cloud-based customer and call center systems to customers in many countries. Read more [...]
Visit telemagic.noWe analyzed Telemagic.no page load time and found that the first response time was 403 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
telemagic.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
2/100
10%
Value28.2 s
0/100
25%
Value21.1 s
0/100
10%
Value14,980 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.146
77/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
403 ms
1297 ms
189 ms
408 ms
405 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Telemagic.no, 21% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (9 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 181.0 kB (5%)
3.5 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Telemagic.no main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Telemagic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Telemagic.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (54%)
63
29
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Telemagic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
telemagic.no
403 ms
1297 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
189 ms
icons.css
408 ms
300plus_free_outline_icons_v2.css
405 ms
style.min.css
97 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
111 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
111 ms
b3line_font_free.css
308 ms
b3_ie7_free.css
142 ms
b3_frontend_free.css
426 ms
style.css
319 ms
css
112 ms
dashicons.min.css
112 ms
jetpack.css
99 ms
jquery.min.js
108 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
114 ms
icons.js
458 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
112 ms
recaptcha.js
574 ms
et-core-unified-tb-3820-924-16643598694502.min.css
618 ms
et-core-unified-924-16643598694502.min.css
543 ms
tmg-chat.min.js
869 ms
259539.js
83 ms
photon.min.js
67 ms
api.js
147 ms
b3-ie7_free.js
419 ms
b3icons_free.js
730 ms
custom.unified.js
852 ms
intersection-observer.js
729 ms
lazy-images.js
716 ms
common.js
727 ms
wp-embed.min.js
68 ms
e-202240.js
69 ms
fbevents.js
245 ms
TMG-logo.png
1377 ms
contact-center_500.png
839 ms
Facebook.png
1450 ms
Anbudstorget.png
1357 ms
Ekansio-2.png
1359 ms
Fortum-2.png
3140 ms
Salesforce-1.png
1505 ms
Logo-ms-dynamics.jpg
1354 ms
elhub-logo-original-1.png
1851 ms
Vipps-1.png
1665 ms
godtlevert.png
2099 ms
inbound-square-1.png
694 ms
outbound-square-1.png
820 ms
Twilio.png
1354 ms
Brilliant.png
1354 ms
Hafslund.png
1100 ms
Netigate-1.png
1098 ms
download-1.png
1595 ms
Artboard-3.png
692 ms
Amazon.png
1352 ms
Lekane.png
1117 ms
Zendesk.png
1346 ms
LinkMobility.png
1098 ms
MediaConnect.png
1431 ms
download-2.png
1346 ms
gota-energi-2.png
2154 ms
home-1.png
1054 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
675 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
677 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
952 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff
954 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff
955 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff
963 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
955 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff
961 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff
966 ms
modules.ttf
543 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrMfJg.woff
962 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejMDrMfJg.woff
963 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjNDrMfJg.woff
969 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJg.woff
968 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDrMfJg.woff
967 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDrMfJg.woff
968 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJg.woff
1141 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejLDrMfJg.woff
1141 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4cHLDrMfJg.woff
1141 ms
identity.js
342 ms
391414831233925
855 ms
recaptcha__en.js
410 ms
telemagic.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
telemagic.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
telemagic.no SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Telemagic.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Telemagic.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
telemagic.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Telemagic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: