14.4 sec in total
2.7 sec
11.1 sec
632 ms
Click here to check amazing Telnetport 25 content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about telnetport25.com
All about Microsoft technologies especially Microsoft Exchange Server
Visit telnetport25.comWe analyzed Telnetport25.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
telnetport25.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
2684 ms
279 ms
203 ms
39 ms
359 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Telnetport25.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Telnetport25.com.
Page size can be reduced by 920.1 kB (77%)
1.2 MB
281.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Telnetport25.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 825.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 237.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 237.7 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Telnetport 25 needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 607.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 607.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Telnetport25.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (76%)
58
14
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Telnetport 25. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.telnetport25.com
2684 ms
layout.css
279 ms
custom.css
203 ms
shareaholic.js
39 ms
jetpack.css
359 ms
jquery.js
438 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
200 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
wp-embed.min.js
107 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
116 ms
a6bb72df8b521322e1da4311c41133f3.json
56 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
collect
49 ms
icon-rss.gif
308 ms
TelnetportLogo.png
307 ms
dot-ddd.gif
307 ms
twit.png
306 ms
f_logo.png
305 ms
Youtube_logo.png
306 ms
btn_viewmy_120x33.png
329 ms
shrMain.min.js
216 ms
g.gif
68 ms
jquery.min.js
59 ms
pageview.gif
39 ms
vglnk.js
40 ms
partners.js
217 ms
pixel.gif
25 ms
pixel.gif
27 ms
sholic.js
7 ms
usermatch
170 ms
beacon.js
9 ms
cms-sh2c.html
70 ms
eexelate.js
3 ms
7 ms
ep
7 ms
ep
9 ms
pixel
21 ms
143 ms
cm
9 ms
ping_match.gif
10 ms
2964
74 ms
pixel
34 ms
ermcm
9 ms
match-result
43 ms
bounce
14 ms
rs
7 ms
usermatch
121 ms
net.php
12 ms
pixel
14 ms
generic
9 ms
generic
10 ms
xrefid.xgi
7 ms
pixel.gif
9 ms
pixel.gif
28 ms
xrefid.xgi
8 ms
pixel
52 ms
Vu2GccAoJY8AAj4j8XEAAAA1%26964
223 ms
usersync.aspx
154 ms
i.gif
164 ms
cs
177 ms
ping
64 ms
crum
232 ms
crum
261 ms
owa.tracker-combined-min.js
1086 ms
crum
213 ms
domains
50 ms
m
27 ms
rum
154 ms
crum
201 ms
crum
202 ms
crum
208 ms
telnetport25.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
telnetport25.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
telnetport25.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Telnetport25.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Telnetport25.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
telnetport25.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Telnetport 25. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: