12.4 sec in total
1.6 sec
10.1 sec
672 ms
Click here to check amazing Tenderlicious content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tenderlicious.net
To get the most flavor from your brisket, you need a paper that’s going to lock the flavor in during storage. If your paper is leaking everywhere, it’s leaking flavor and quality. We’ll help you find ...
Visit tenderlicious.netWe analyzed Tenderlicious.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 10.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
tenderlicious.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
1617 ms
762 ms
792 ms
792 ms
785 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Tenderlicious.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Tenderlicious.net.
Page size can be reduced by 70.8 kB (2%)
3.7 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Tenderlicious.net main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tenderlicious images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tenderlicious.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (52%)
42
20
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tenderlicious. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tenderlicious.net
1617 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
762 ms
styles.css
792 ms
wc-gateway-ppec-frontend-cart.css
792 ms
style.css
785 ms
style.css
802 ms
reset.css
59 ms
main_blue.css
1258 ms
jquery.js
2006 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1557 ms
css
56 ms
thrive_flat.css
2080 ms
frontend.css
1533 ms
scripts.js
1547 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
2000 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
2289 ms
js.cookie.min.js
2283 ms
woocommerce.min.js
2291 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
2728 ms
script.js
2968 ms
frontend.min.js
2762 ms
wp-embed.min.js
3054 ms
frontend.min.js
3268 ms
frontend.min.js
3041 ms
css
22 ms
Logo.png
1450 ms
main-image.png
2923 ms
bg-article.png
2687 ms
Pink-Butcher-Kraft-Paper-Roll1.jpg
3152 ms
arrow-right.png
1766 ms
article-image.png
2752 ms
White-Kraft-Butcher-Paper-Roll1.jpg
2690 ms
Kay.jpg
2036 ms
start.png
2812 ms
Josh.jpg
3664 ms
Gary.jpg
3690 ms
Meat-In-Paper.png
4422 ms
Vegan-Brisket.jpg
4317 ms
BBQ-Smoker.jpg
4135 ms
shop-image.png
5066 ms
tenderlicious.net
3937 ms
discount-icont.png
4445 ms
tenderlicious.net
3422 ms
tenderlicious.net accessibility score
tenderlicious.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
tenderlicious.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tenderlicious.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tenderlicious.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tenderlicious.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tenderlicious. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: