Tools & Wizards About Us
terrigal.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

terrigal.org

Central Coast Tourism, Accommodation and Business Listings

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

746 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

160 ms

terrigal.org screenshot

About Website

Visit terrigal.org now to see the best up-to-date Terrigal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about terrigal.org

Central Coast Tourism, Central Coast Accommodation, Central Coast Business Listings. Visit our website for accommodation, tourism and business information.

Visit terrigal.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Terrigal.org page load time and found that the first response time was 746 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

terrigal.org performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

terrigal.org

746 ms

pop.js

656 ms

stylesheet.css

637 ms

searchdb.js

864 ms

searchfunc.js

1103 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Terrigal.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Terrigal.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 29.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

182.5 kB

After Optimization

153.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Terrigal.org main page is 182.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 153.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 26.5 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 153.3 kB
  • After minification 148.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Terrigal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 275 B

  • Original 418 B
  • After minification 334 B
  • After compression 143 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 275 B or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 528 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Terrigal.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (35%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Terrigal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

terrigal.org

terrigal.org

746 ms

pop.js

pop.js

656 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

637 ms

searchdb.js

searchdb.js

864 ms

searchfunc.js

searchfunc.js

1103 ms

trg_r3_c1.gif

trg_r3_c1.gif

332 ms

trg_r1_c5.jpg

trg_r1_c5.jpg

334 ms

trg_r1_c11.gif

trg_r1_c11.gif

491 ms

trg_r2_c1.gif

trg_r2_c1.gif

479 ms

trg_r2_c3.jpg

trg_r2_c3.jpg

481 ms

trg_r2_c7.jpg

trg_r2_c7.jpg

714 ms

trg_r2_c13.jpg

trg_r2_c13.jpg

626 ms

trg_r5_c1.gif

trg_r5_c1.gif

593 ms

google_map.jpg

google_map.jpg

719 ms

spacer1.gif

spacer1.gif

716 ms

spacer2.gif

spacer2.gif

725 ms

nav_banner1a.gif

nav_banner1a.gif

833 ms

bullet3.gif

bullet3.gif

865 ms

nav_banner2a.gif

nav_banner2a.gif

952 ms

jetlo-flights.gif

jetlo-flights.gif

960 ms

Quad-728x90.jpg

Quad-728x90.jpg

972 ms

whatson.jpg

whatson.jpg

964 ms

accommodation.jpg

accommodation.jpg

1078 ms

weddings.jpg

weddings.jpg

1103 ms

conference.jpg

conference.jpg

1320 ms

trg_r7_c1.gif

trg_r7_c1.gif

1326 ms

trg_r7_c4.gif

trg_r7_c4.gif

1301 ms

icon_1.gif

icon_1.gif

1323 ms

trg_r8_c1.gif

trg_r8_c1.gif

1321 ms

trg_r8_c4.gif

trg_r8_c4.gif

1342 ms

trg_r7_c9.gif

trg_r7_c9.gif

1109 ms

Accessibility Review

terrigal.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

terrigal.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

terrigal.org SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Terrigal.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Terrigal.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

terrigal.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Terrigal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: