Tools & Wizards About Us
test.top10bestdatingsites.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

test.top10bestdatingsites.com

Best Dating Sites and Apps 2024: Expert Reviews & User Insights

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

940 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

355 ms

test.top10bestdatingsites.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to test.top10bestdatingsites.com homepage info - get ready to check Test Top10 Best Dating Sites best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about test.top10bestdatingsites.com

Explore the best dating sites and apps of 2024 for love and serious relationships. Your guide to finding the perfect match!

Visit test.top10bestdatingsites.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Test.top10bestdatingsites.com page load time and found that the first response time was 940 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

test.top10bestdatingsites.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,480 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

test.top10bestdatingsites.com

940 ms

css

33 ms

css

40 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

17 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Test.top10bestdatingsites.com, 36% (33 requests) were made to Cdn.test.top10bestdatingsites.com and 15% (14 requests) were made to Api.qa.naturaltracking.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.test.top10bestdatingsites.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 591.6 kB (64%)

Content Size

928.3 kB

After Optimization

336.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Test.top10bestdatingsites.com main page is 928.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 418.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 75.2 kB

  • Original 94.7 kB
  • After minification 90.2 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 60.6 kB

  • Original 181.7 kB
  • After minification 121.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Test Top10 Best Dating Sites needs image optimization as it can save up to 60.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 257.6 kB

  • Original 418.7 kB
  • After minification 389.1 kB
  • After compression 161.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.6 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 198.2 kB

  • Original 233.3 kB
  • After minification 198.8 kB
  • After compression 35.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Test.top10bestdatingsites.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 198.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (79%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test Top10 Best Dating Sites. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

test.top10bestdatingsites.com

test.top10bestdatingsites.com

940 ms

css

css

33 ms

css

css

40 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

17 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

jquery.qtip.min.css

17 ms

partners_1.css

partners_1.css

19 ms

style.css

style.css

102 ms

videotutorials_banner.css

videotutorials_banner.css

19 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

17 ms

jCarusellite.js

jCarusellite.js

19 ms

jquery.tinysort.min.js

jquery.tinysort.min.js

19 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

20 ms

jquery.raty.min.js

jquery.raty.min.js

20 ms

jquery.stickytableheaders.min.js

jquery.stickytableheaders.min.js

21 ms

bootbox.min.js

bootbox.min.js

22 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

22 ms

tags.js

tags.js

515 ms

jquery.tablesorter.min.js

jquery.tablesorter.min.js

21 ms

header_custom.js

header_custom.js

21 ms

nav.js

nav.js

89 ms

register_session.php

register_session.php

70 ms

language_selector.css

language_selector.css

27 ms

jquery-migrate.js

jquery-migrate.js

11 ms

jquery.qtip.min.js

jquery.qtip.min.js

10 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js

1026 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

10 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

12 ms

lazyload-min.js

lazyload-min.js

13 ms

functions.js

functions.js

907 ms

css

css

19 ms

track

track

369 ms

track

track

423 ms

track

track

419 ms

track

track

382 ms

track

track

409 ms

track

track

413 ms

track

track

630 ms

track

track

634 ms

track

track

638 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

16 ms

track

track

639 ms

track

track

650 ms

track

track

631 ms

tfa.js

tfa.js

32 ms

7399.js

7399.js

9 ms

46 ms

45 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

22 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

collect

collect

122 ms

set.js

set.js

369 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

collect

collect

119 ms

dc.js

dc.js

93 ms

logo.png

logo.png

47 ms

sprites.png

sprites.png

49 ms

zoosk_banner_yellow.png

zoosk_banner_yellow.png

47 ms

zoosk_comparison.png

zoosk_comparison.png

46 ms

MatchLogo_140x50.png

MatchLogo_140x50.png

47 ms

ourtime_us_top5.png

ourtime_us_top5.png

48 ms

EliteSinglesus_comparisson.png

EliteSinglesus_comparisson.png

47 ms

christian-mingle.png

christian-mingle.png

48 ms

black_people_meet_us_top5.png

black_people_meet_us_top5.png

50 ms

jdate_us_top5.png

jdate_us_top5.png

50 ms

single_parent_meet_us_top5.png

single_parent_meet_us_top5.png

113 ms

professionalmatchlogo.png

professionalmatchlogo.png

775 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

48 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

105 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

109 ms

y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

109 ms

dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf

dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf

109 ms

MEz38VLIFL-t46JUtkIEgH4UHu-c0cTZKOwO_f6u1Os.ttf

MEz38VLIFL-t46JUtkIEgH4UHu-c0cTZKOwO_f6u1Os.ttf

108 ms

dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf

dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf

109 ms

data_layer

data_layer

69 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

63 ms

activityi;src=4343679;type=invmedia;cat=n6moqz8n;ord=473793654236.9425

activityi;src=4343679;type=invmedia;cat=n6moqz8n;ord=473793654236.9425

61 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf

46 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf

46 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

26 ms

35 ms

30 ms

track

track

176 ms

s

s

41 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

26 ms

arrow-down.png

arrow-down.png

27 ms

star-on.png

star-on.png

26 ms

star-off.png

star-off.png

904 ms

star-half.png

star-half.png

918 ms

u

u

34 ms

track

track

189 ms

Accessibility Review

test.top10bestdatingsites.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

test.top10bestdatingsites.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

test.top10bestdatingsites.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.top10bestdatingsites.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Test.top10bestdatingsites.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

test.top10bestdatingsites.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Test Top10 Best Dating Sites. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: