Tools & Wizards About Us
testdoc.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

testdoc.ru

Тесты и экзамены с ответами онлайн бесплатно для студентов и школьников

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

457 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

202 ms

testdoc.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Testdoc content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about testdoc.ru

Тесты и экзамены с ответами онлайн бесплатно для студентов и школьников

Visit testdoc.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Testdoc.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 457 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

testdoc.ru performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,430 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.145

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

testdoc.ru

457 ms

testdoc.ru

588 ms

css

43 ms

style.css

114 ms

style.min.css

227 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Testdoc.ru, 21% (12 requests) were made to 1.gravatar.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to 0.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source An.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 320.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

553.5 kB

After Optimization

233.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Testdoc.ru main page is 553.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 259.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 183.7 kB

  • Original 224.6 kB
  • After minification 222.4 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 40.8 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Testdoc needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 129.2 kB

  • Original 259.4 kB
  • After minification 259.4 kB
  • After compression 130.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.2 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 913 B

  • Original 28.8 kB
  • After minification 28.8 kB
  • After compression 27.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testdoc.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (59%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testdoc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

testdoc.ru

testdoc.ru

457 ms

testdoc.ru

testdoc.ru

588 ms

css

css

43 ms

style.css

style.css

114 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

227 ms

adsplacer.adblock.css

adsplacer.adblock.css

27 ms

styles.css

styles.css

321 ms

style.css

style.css

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

332 ms

jquery.iframetracker.js

jquery.iframetracker.js

40 ms

jquery.adsplacer.frontend.js

jquery.adsplacer.frontend.js

56 ms

jquery.adsplacer.ab-testing.js

jquery.adsplacer.ab-testing.js

31 ms

sab_bar_script.js

sab_bar_script.js

329 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

329 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

334 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

335 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

156 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

434 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

435 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

440 ms

index.js

index.js

445 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

447 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

107 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

224 ms

15619c50082bca389709edac8d1ae922

15619c50082bca389709edac8d1ae922

28 ms

60ba48c9dca181307ce7d3fe71f02c6d

60ba48c9dca181307ce7d3fe71f02c6d

28 ms

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

651 ms

37ccd5e29057cf68997912ebcc57fc6b

37ccd5e29057cf68997912ebcc57fc6b

29 ms

6556a9c45bf86f6b8351cdd2c7d7ee13

6556a9c45bf86f6b8351cdd2c7d7ee13

32 ms

logotd.png

logotd.png

301 ms

add-ico.png

add-ico.png

200 ms

bq_bg.png

bq_bg.png

206 ms

comment-icon.png

comment-icon.png

209 ms

72f114621f728ff7e21918d6d293e048

72f114621f728ff7e21918d6d293e048

28 ms

df44426a4866c730b13983fb2c7f4a0f

df44426a4866c730b13983fb2c7f4a0f

29 ms

73c5cde22179af4b29724a715b79bcc8

73c5cde22179af4b29724a715b79bcc8

30 ms

a369b188c335bfa7ab9b3f18a7acfaf8

a369b188c335bfa7ab9b3f18a7acfaf8

30 ms

dd1fcd5ebc94d240345d51148c6f5f21

dd1fcd5ebc94d240345d51148c6f5f21

30 ms

comments-title-icon.png

comments-title-icon.png

190 ms

15619c50082bca389709edac8d1ae922

15619c50082bca389709edac8d1ae922

75 ms

60ba48c9dca181307ce7d3fe71f02c6d

60ba48c9dca181307ce7d3fe71f02c6d

75 ms

72f114621f728ff7e21918d6d293e048

72f114621f728ff7e21918d6d293e048

75 ms

37ccd5e29057cf68997912ebcc57fc6b

37ccd5e29057cf68997912ebcc57fc6b

74 ms

df44426a4866c730b13983fb2c7f4a0f

df44426a4866c730b13983fb2c7f4a0f

74 ms

dd1fcd5ebc94d240345d51148c6f5f21

dd1fcd5ebc94d240345d51148c6f5f21

74 ms

a369b188c335bfa7ab9b3f18a7acfaf8

a369b188c335bfa7ab9b3f18a7acfaf8

73 ms

73c5cde22179af4b29724a715b79bcc8

73c5cde22179af4b29724a715b79bcc8

76 ms

6556a9c45bf86f6b8351cdd2c7d7ee13

6556a9c45bf86f6b8351cdd2c7d7ee13

72 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxM.woff

91 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc-.woff

95 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-.woff

104 ms

context.js

context.js

1102 ms

watch.js

watch.js

0 ms

uptolike.js

uptolike.js

743 ms

watch.js

watch.js

11 ms

version.js

version.js

132 ms

widgetsModule.js

widgetsModule.js

265 ms

Accessibility Review

testdoc.ru accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

testdoc.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

testdoc.ru SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testdoc.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testdoc.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

testdoc.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Testdoc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: