Tools & Wizards About Us
testing-instruments.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

testing-instruments.in

Testing instruments for electrical power industry, testing equipments and transformer manufacturers in Gujarat, India'

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

269 ms

testing-instruments.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Testing Instruments content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about testing-instruments.in

Supplier and Manufacturer of high quality Testing Instruments, Electrical Testing Equipment, Power Transformers, servoce stabilizers, offered by Testing Instruments, Surat, Gujarat,All India.

Visit testing-instruments.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Testing-instruments.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

testing-instruments.in performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.595

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

testing-instruments.in

1068 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

243 ms

all.css

469 ms

all.css

474 ms

all.css

477 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Testing-instruments.in, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Testing-instruments.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (25%)

Content Size

10.6 MB

After Optimization

8.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Testing-instruments.in main page is 10.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 23.1 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 47% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 2.3 MB

  • Original 9.8 MB
  • After minification 7.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Testing Instruments needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 336.0 kB

  • Original 711.9 kB
  • After minification 711.7 kB
  • After compression 375.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 336.0 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 84.0 kB
  • After minification 84.0 kB
  • After compression 80.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testing-instruments.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testing Instruments. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

testing-instruments.in

testing-instruments.in

1068 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

243 ms

all.css

all.css

469 ms

all.css

all.css

474 ms

all.css

all.css

477 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

473 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

497 ms

email.min.js

email.min.js

61 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

glightbox.min.css

glightbox.min.css

21 ms

slick.css

slick.css

515 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

704 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

705 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

705 ms

aos.css

aos.css

61 ms

style.css

style.css

712 ms

emailjs.js

emailjs.js

728 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

749 ms

aos.js

aos.js

85 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

938 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

982 ms

glightbox.min.js

glightbox.min.js

26 ms

main.js

main.js

980 ms

anchor

anchor

70 ms

embed

embed

328 ms

Logo.JPG

Logo.JPG

484 ms

Slider1.png

Slider1.png

1617 ms

Slider6.png

Slider6.png

1977 ms

Slider2.png

Slider2.png

1819 ms

Slider3.png

Slider3.png

2060 ms

Slider4.png

Slider4.png

2063 ms

Slider5.png

Slider5.png

2090 ms

Panel-2.jpeg

Panel-2.jpeg

1852 ms

man.png

man.png

2054 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

23 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

128 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

135 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

css2

css2

49 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNRwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNRwaA.ttf

21 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexaFRwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexaFRwaA.ttf

30 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexc1RwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexc1RwaA.ttf

43 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNRwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNRwaA.ttf

43 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexU1WwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexU1WwaA.ttf

42 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRWwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRWwaA.ttf

43 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNWwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNWwaA.ttf

43 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexTpWwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexTpWwaA.ttf

38 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

1766 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

1902 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

1965 ms

js

js

35 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

5 ms

search.js

search.js

18 ms

main.js

main.js

23 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1828 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

1832 ms

Accessibility Review

testing-instruments.in accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

testing-instruments.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

testing-instruments.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testing-instruments.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testing-instruments.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

testing-instruments.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Testing Instruments. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: