Access testingsoft.com. Testing Software | Near Shore - Agile QA Consultancy For Development

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

testingsoft.com

149 ms

www.testingsoft.com

1330 ms

analytics.js

39 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

198 ms

widget.css

201 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Testingsoft.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Testingsoft.com.

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Testingsoft.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 53.7 kB

Original 67.4 kB
After minification 61.9 kB
After compression 13.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Testing Soft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 96.8 kB

Original 308.9 kB
After minification 308.9 kB
After compression 212.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.8 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 43.8 kB

Original 107.4 kB
After minification 107.4 kB
After compression 63.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testingsoft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testing Soft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testingsoft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testingsoft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

testingsoft.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Testing Soft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Testing Software | Near Shore - Agile QA Consultancy For Development

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

testingsoft.com

www.testingsoft.com

analytics.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

widget.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

testingsoft.com

www.testingsoft.com

analytics.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

widget.css

crayon.min.css

social_icons_widget.css

styles.css

css

screen.min.css

chosen.css

frontend.css

css

css

style.css

shortcodes.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

magnific_popup.css

ytprefs.min.css

lightbox.min.css

jquery.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

crayon.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

collect

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

jquery.form.min.js

scripts.js

qppr_frontend_script.min.js

ssba.min.js

front.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

custom.js

smoothscroll.js

jquery.fitvids.js

waypoints.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

fitvids.min.js

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

jquery.lightbox.min.js

wp-embed.min.js