1.8 sec in total
21 ms
1.2 sec
505 ms
Visit texasclinic.net now to see the best up-to-date Texas Clinic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about texasclinic.net
Trusted Pain Management Specialist serving Plano, TX. Contact us at 469-200-6461 or visit us at 6020 W Parker Rd, Suite 300, Plano, TX 75093: Texas Star Pain & Spine
Visit texasclinic.netWe analyzed Texasclinic.net page load time and found that the first response time was 21 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
texasclinic.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value3.9 s
51/100
25%
Value5.7 s
50/100
10%
Value1,420 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
21 ms
31 ms
792 ms
101 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Texasclinic.net, 54% (13 requests) were made to Sa1s3optim.patientpop.com and 21% (5 requests) were made to Sa1s3.patientpop.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (792 ms) belongs to the original domain Texasclinic.net.
Page size can be reduced by 96.9 kB (12%)
803.0 kB
706.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Texasclinic.net main page is 803.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 707.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texas Clinic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 59 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59 B or 11% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
16
16
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texas Clinic. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
texasclinic.net
21 ms
texasclinic.net
31 ms
www.texasclinic.net
792 ms
practice.atomic.application.scss
101 ms
306320.jpg
24 ms
practice.application.js
95 ms
306321.jpg
25 ms
306322.jpg
33 ms
306323.jpg
32 ms
306324.jpg
32 ms
307238.jpg
33 ms
307239.jpg
33 ms
307242.jpg
31 ms
307243.jpg
36 ms
307237.jpg
34 ms
307240.jpg
36 ms
307241.jpg
35 ms
1747487.jpg
143 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
40 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
47 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
49 ms
pp-font-awesome-atomic-subset.woff
48 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
47 ms
aem.js
87 ms
texasclinic.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
texasclinic.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
texasclinic.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texasclinic.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texasclinic.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texasclinic.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Texas Clinic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: