Tools & Wizards About Us
texasgemservice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

texasgemservice.com

Professional Jewelry Appraisals | Texas Gem Service | Baytown

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

56 ms

texasgemservice.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Texas Gem Service content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about texasgemservice.com

TGS offers professional appraisals of jewelry, diamonds, gemstones and watches. Book your jewelry appraisal appointment today. It can be done while you watch. We are located in Baytown Texas

Visit texasgemservice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Texasgemservice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

texasgemservice.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.texasgemservice.com

60 ms

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

65 ms

thunderbolt-commons.ce27524c.bundle.min.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Texasgemservice.com, 39% (18 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (784 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 701.3 kB (61%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

450.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Texasgemservice.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 735.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 589.2 kB

  • Original 735.6 kB
  • After minification 733.8 kB
  • After compression 146.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 589.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 61.3 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Texas Gem Service needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 98.0 kB

  • Original 354.4 kB
  • After minification 354.4 kB
  • After compression 256.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (30%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texas Gem Service. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.texasgemservice.com

www.texasgemservice.com

60 ms

minified.js

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

65 ms

thunderbolt-commons.ce27524c.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.ce27524c.bundle.min.js

24 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

53 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

23 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

53 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

52 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

53 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

50 ms

GIA_ALUM.png

GIA_ALUM.png

264 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

50 ms

035244_7ab29c72994f4040bafcacadad3a166c~mv2.png

035244_7ab29c72994f4040bafcacadad3a166c~mv2.png

56 ms

035244_ee632884fe314cc28bdd10946aab3ac8~mv2.png

035244_ee632884fe314cc28bdd10946aab3ac8~mv2.png

55 ms

035244_0ffd26364b1841ca8b891a68587a8769~mv2.png

035244_0ffd26364b1841ca8b891a68587a8769~mv2.png

56 ms

035244_ffe13ba923894ba2acac501db7cec6f1~mv2.png

035244_ffe13ba923894ba2acac501db7cec6f1~mv2.png

56 ms

f52aa5_cd5cac76d7264adf8318747108cd3910.png

f52aa5_cd5cac76d7264adf8318747108cd3910.png

177 ms

f52aa5_887b9d79f2a6432d8481419a9a04e53c.png

f52aa5_887b9d79f2a6432d8481419a9a04e53c.png

227 ms

f52aa5_d483c1def39b47b4aa02640c41da0ebc.png

f52aa5_d483c1def39b47b4aa02640c41da0ebc.png

245 ms

f52aa5_1d9006a96a1d4854b980e063a60f62ca~mv2.jpg

f52aa5_1d9006a96a1d4854b980e063a60f62ca~mv2.jpg

539 ms

f52aa5_d85f50458eef4f2589b318536bde0574~mv2.png

f52aa5_d85f50458eef4f2589b318536bde0574~mv2.png

259 ms

f52aa5_47a398a4b9f14d9db4c3ca2df2f20d3a~mv2.jpg

f52aa5_47a398a4b9f14d9db4c3ca2df2f20d3a~mv2.jpg

553 ms

f52aa5_fc38b8be9d974d80b0451ecccbb9c5b6~mv2_d_1920_2880_s_2.jpg

f52aa5_fc38b8be9d974d80b0451ecccbb9c5b6~mv2_d_1920_2880_s_2.jpg

524 ms

f52aa5_876e045213a045b4bb61aa56cde44ed1.gif

f52aa5_876e045213a045b4bb61aa56cde44ed1.gif

233 ms

f52aa5_2c70e0fd97b840c4bd94b39ba81126e3.gif

f52aa5_2c70e0fd97b840c4bd94b39ba81126e3.gif

238 ms

f52aa5_4c3140b03fa1487986ff0c8b9e8c8d92.jpg

f52aa5_4c3140b03fa1487986ff0c8b9e8c8d92.jpg

476 ms

f52aa5_50ae1e53e9c944f088fd68be64599ffb.jpg

f52aa5_50ae1e53e9c944f088fd68be64599ffb.jpg

463 ms

f52aa5_e1ccfbda7cbb4991854234c9c4dca161.jpg

f52aa5_e1ccfbda7cbb4991854234c9c4dca161.jpg

493 ms

f52aa5_1e3e5667d86a4f0381d072080394aa1c.jpg

f52aa5_1e3e5667d86a4f0381d072080394aa1c.jpg

784 ms

103 ms

101 ms

100 ms

100 ms

99 ms

98 ms

131 ms

128 ms

126 ms

129 ms

129 ms

125 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

12 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

26 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

texasgemservice.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

texasgemservice.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

texasgemservice.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texasgemservice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texasgemservice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

texasgemservice.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Texas Gem Service. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: