6 sec in total
531 ms
4.7 sec
689 ms
Welcome to texel.es homepage info - get ready to check Texel best content for Spain right away, or after learning these important things about texel.es
Productora Audiovisual líder en España. ¿Necesitas un vídeo para una presentación, para tu empresa o producto? ¡Llamanos! Presupuesto online.
Visit texel.esWe analyzed Texel.es page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
texel.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value17.6 s
0/100
10%
Value5,160 ms
0/100
30%
Value1.32
0/100
15%
Value22.5 s
1/100
10%
531 ms
2557 ms
33 ms
191 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Texel.es, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Texel.es.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (61%)
2.2 MB
848.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Texel.es main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 928.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 472.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 472.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 757.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texel.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 757.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (46%)
76
41
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
texel.es
531 ms
www.texel.es
2557 ms
ga.js
33 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
191 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
202 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
214 ms
style.css
213 ms
styles.css
216 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
215 ms
wpp.css
293 ms
js_composer.css
302 ms
css
32 ms
css
39 ms
css
47 ms
main.min.css
705 ms
font-awesome.min.css
320 ms
custom-43adc72f35.css
537 ms
media.min.css
395 ms
royalslider.css
399 ms
style.css
424 ms
jquery.js
531 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
500 ms
modernizr.js
497 ms
svg-icons.min.js
530 ms
jquery.form.min.js
596 ms
scripts.js
604 ms
jquery.royalslider.js
807 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
collect
62 ms
plugins.min.js
737 ms
desktop-tablet.min.js
571 ms
desktop.min.js
625 ms
main.min.js
736 ms
wp-embed.min.js
737 ms
js_composer_front.js
751 ms
core.min.js
753 ms
widget.min.js
815 ms
accordion.min.js
816 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
818 ms
jquery.validationEngine-es.js
818 ms
dt-contact-form.js
867 ms
skin1.general-boxed-bg-image.jpg
710 ms
logo-header-norma_v2l.png
665 ms
fondo_home.jpg
683 ms
thumbnail-home2.jpg
684 ms
teaser-videos.jpg
685 ms
teaser-sectores.jpg
685 ms
teaser-presupuesto.jpg
686 ms
teaser-iconos.jpg
686 ms
skill-bg.png
687 ms
camara1.jpg
688 ms
skin1.stripes-stripe-3-bg-image.jpg
688 ms
logo-tecuni1.png
689 ms
gazc.png
690 ms
logo-itp.png
691 ms
logo-nespresso.png
691 ms
logo-tecnalia.png
692 ms
logo-deloitte.png
693 ms
logo-adif.png
694 ms
nemak2.png
693 ms
quotes3.png
694 ms
minilogo-torrent-50x50.jpg
695 ms
minilogo-testmotors-50x50.jpg
696 ms
minilogo_soluciones-50x50.jpg
697 ms
minilogo-aliberico-50x50.jpg
697 ms
universidad-audiovisual-482x271.jpg
774 ms
a7sII-623x350.jpg
774 ms
freelance-600x337.jpg
781 ms
gopro-500x280.jpg
774 ms
steadycam-600x337.jpg
773 ms
texel-15-b-184x104.jpg
761 ms
mapa-google.jpg
698 ms
spidex-60x60.jpg
700 ms
pinnacle-studio-60x60.png
778 ms
freelance-60x60.jpg
778 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
544 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
543 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
738 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
544 ms
logo-floating-normal_v2.png
210 ms
toggle_open.png
210 ms
toggle_close.png
204 ms
texel.es accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
texel.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
texel.es SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texel.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texel.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texel.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Texel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: