5.4 sec in total
327 ms
4.4 sec
728 ms
Welcome to texelevignet.com homepage info - get ready to check Texel Evignet best content right away, or after learning these important things about texelevignet.com
Parking on Texel
Visit texelevignet.comWe analyzed Texelevignet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 327 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
texelevignet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value1,960 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
327 ms
2070 ms
193 ms
292 ms
398 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Texelevignet.com, 68% (76 requests) were made to Texelvignet.nl and 10% (11 requests) were made to B.tile.openstreetmap.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Texelvignet.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 241.6 kB (18%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Texelevignet.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 571.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 99.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Texel Evignet needs image optimization as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 68.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texelevignet.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (61%)
101
39
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texel Evignet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
texelevignet.com
327 ms
2070 ms
shortcode-ultimate.css
193 ms
font-awesome.min.css
292 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
398 ms
font-awesome-v4-shims.css
303 ms
animate.min.css
307 ms
sppagebuilder.css
416 ms
template.css
305 ms
magnific-popup.css
390 ms
e25e982c786a2ab8ddedd85064399de3.css
401 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
403 ms
greensock.js
509 ms
jquery.min.js
600 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
507 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
507 ms
shortcode-ultimate.js
506 ms
jquery.parallax.js
532 ms
sppagebuilder.js
613 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
611 ms
perfect-scrollbar.js
611 ms
mod_vertical_menu.js
615 ms
core.js
613 ms
ct-functions.js
698 ms
ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js
42 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
711 ms
init.js
707 ms
css2
45 ms
all.css
43 ms
icomoon.css
624 ms
compiled-b8d3f8c64e88b936a8d20c375f461a3d.css
744 ms
compiled-9057c0f146fef51a129dda65746639a1.css
650 ms
custom.css
708 ms
olwidget.css
718 ms
ol_google.css
720 ms
geocontent.css
720 ms
mootools-core.js
762 ms
core.js
806 ms
mootools-more.js
1020 ms
OpenLayers.js
1130 ms
siteanalyze_6005997.js
237 ms
OpenStreetMap.js
818 ms
olwidget.js
751 ms
gc_map_wrapper.js
653 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
709 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
717 ms
jquery.noConflict.js
733 ms
smooth-scroll.polyfills.min.js
653 ms
script.js
711 ms
css
22 ms
nl.gif
432 ms
de.gif
432 ms
en_gb.gif
435 ms
logo-evignet.svg
503 ms
logo-gemeente-texel.svg
507 ms
auto-schijf-en.svg
514 ms
pijl.svg
587 ms
parkeerplaats.svg
588 ms
kenteken-en.svg
615 ms
kaartprijzen-eng-edit.svg
720 ms
klokken.svg
714 ms
dorp.svg
715 ms
video-bg.png
976 ms
video-bg-en.png
974 ms
kaart-texel.svg
787 ms
hotjar-347864.js
95 ms
gtm.js
64 ms
bg-links.svg
243 ms
verbindings-lijn.svg
242 ms
verbindings-lijn-klein.svg
242 ms
verbindings-lijn-klein-2.svg
329 ms
TeV2023-header_ENG.svg
312 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3aPw.ttf
134 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zAkA.ttf
191 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_AkA.ttf
213 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rAkA.ttf
211 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vAkA.ttf
211 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nAkA.ttf
212 ms
324D28_0_0.woff
297 ms
arlrdbd-webfont.woff
297 ms
image.aspx
92 ms
style.css
177 ms
layer-switcher-maximize.png
99 ms
layer-switcher-minimize.png
100 ms
north-mini.png
99 ms
west-mini.png
99 ms
east-mini.png
100 ms
south-mini.png
100 ms
zoom-plus-mini.png
198 ms
zoom-world-mini.png
199 ms
zoom-minus-mini.png
197 ms
1333.png
18 ms
1332.png
22 ms
1333.png
22 ms
1333.png
23 ms
1332.png
6 ms
1334.png
7 ms
1332.png
3 ms
1334.png
4 ms
1334.png
4 ms
1331.png
5 ms
1333.png
4 ms
1331.png
3 ms
1332.png
3 ms
1331.png
3 ms
1333.png
4 ms
1332.png
3 ms
1335.png
3 ms
1334.png
5 ms
1335.png
4 ms
1334.png
3 ms
texelevignet.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
texelevignet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
texelevignet.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texelevignet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texelevignet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texelevignet.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Texel Evignet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: