Tools & Wizards About Us
texingro.it screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

texingro.it

Ingrosso Tessuti Prato TEX INGRO Tessuti Abbigliamento Stock

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

208 ms

texingro.it screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing TEX INGRO content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about texingro.it

TEX INGRO Ingrosso tessuti per abbigliamento a stock nasce nel febbraio 1998 a Prato per la commercializzazione ingrosso di tessuti moda stock in italia ed estero.

Visit texingro.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Texingro.it page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

texingro.it performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.649

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.texingro.it

1135 ms

style.css

220 ms

styles.css

340 ms

rs6.css

350 ms

style.min.css

339 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Texingro.it, 29% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Texingro.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 121.6 kB (24%)

Content Size

500.3 kB

After Optimization

378.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Texingro.it main page is 500.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 332.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 116.8 kB

  • Original 145.0 kB
  • After minification 143.3 kB
  • After compression 28.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 84 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TEX INGRO images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 912 B

  • Original 332.8 kB
  • After minification 332.8 kB
  • After compression 331.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 19.9 kB
  • After minification 19.7 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texingro.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (89%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TEX INGRO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.texingro.it

www.texingro.it

1135 ms

style.css

style.css

220 ms

styles.css

styles.css

340 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

350 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

339 ms

css

css

31 ms

style.css

style.css

345 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

472 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

362 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

453 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

740 ms

et-core-unified-2.min.css

et-core-unified-2.min.css

407 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

382 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

433 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

491 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

494 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

505 ms

index.js

index.js

508 ms

index.js

index.js

520 ms

cookiechoices.min.js

cookiechoices.min.js

613 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

783 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

625 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

632 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

641 ms

common.js

common.js

782 ms

sticky-elements.js

sticky-elements.js

1014 ms

texingro.png

texingro.png

135 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-559-tb-583-2-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-559-tb-583-2-late.css

121 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

40 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

51 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUhiYA.ttf

52 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUhiYA.ttf

56 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYA.ttf

51 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYA.ttf

50 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUhiYA.ttf

52 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUhiYA.ttf

52 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

223 ms

Accessibility Review

texingro.it accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

texingro.it best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

texingro.it SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texingro.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texingro.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

texingro.it

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: