11.4 sec in total
1 sec
9.9 sec
467 ms
Visit texnolitural.ru now to see the best up-to-date Texnolitural content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about texnolitural.ru
Литейное производство Технолит осуществляет литье из металлов на заказ по доступным ценам. Отливки из чугуна, стали, алюминия, и других цветных металлов высокого качества.
Visit texnolitural.ruWe analyzed Texnolitural.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 10.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
texnolitural.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
1040 ms
1755 ms
361 ms
669 ms
902 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Texnolitural.ru, 17% (16 requests) were made to Core-renderer-tiles.maps.yandex.net and 7% (7 requests) were made to Api-maps.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) belongs to the original domain Texnolitural.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 56.2 kB (3%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Texnolitural.ru main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texnolitural images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texnolitural.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (48%)
71
37
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texnolitural. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
texnolitural.ru
1040 ms
texnolitural.ru
1755 ms
texnolitural.ru
361 ms
ui.design-tokens.css
669 ms
popup.css
902 ms
style.css
903 ms
slick.css
908 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
908 ms
main.css
923 ms
custom.css
974 ms
fancybox_styles.css
1202 ms
core.js
2108 ms
pageobject.js
1215 ms
core_window.js
1518 ms
dexie3.bundle.js
1537 ms
core_ls.js
1281 ms
core_fx.js
1502 ms
core_frame_cache.js
1517 ms
script.js
1588 ms
css
46 ms
717 ms
jquery-2.2.0.min.js
2105 ms
slick.min.js
1821 ms
ofi.min.js
1820 ms
parsley.min.js
1843 ms
main.js
1894 ms
custom.js
2232 ms
jquery.fancybox_v3.1.20.js
2233 ms
js
82 ms
fotorama.js
2233 ms
fancybox_v3_gallery.js
2233 ms
js
72 ms
ba.js
297 ms
tag.js
933 ms
logo.svg
301 ms
texnolitural.ru
305 ms
5e3b3f6ec3fe825fdb2d97f76114cf79.jpg
303 ms
616dfcf6111c0b8df54b2cc2a164f080.jpg
303 ms
1a84b5e37ffb991cfbcc24342d7a875a.png
337 ms
b9a77ac773d14481d7b5a64f1f0146ab.jpg
377 ms
511a38beb5cd9a2a8be5646f9f40666d.jpg
602 ms
3733f5d71313fc24bc7929c4e62be338.jpg
604 ms
cddac22746b260b45144bd65f2775bec.jpg
605 ms
0a7bf09a12268828b540c611bfaee013.jpg
606 ms
85da4fe5376e61a007fbbe73f4c70dab.jpg
644 ms
slide10.jpg
4978 ms
img49.jpg
3151 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
53 ms
raleway-medium-webfont.woff
2296 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
52 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
1743 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
101 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
121 ms
raleway-semibold-webfont.woff
1105 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
121 ms
raleway-bold-webfont.woff
1156 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
120 ms
raleway-extrabold-webfont.woff
2007 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
120 ms
raleway-black-webfont.woff
2074 ms
icomoon.woff
2024 ms
616 ms
bx_stat
180 ms
35dee80df8895822b487.css
717 ms
492 ms
e690f6dd33c8870d6972.yandex.ru.js
1046 ms
e77e226bfcc7cc6124eb.yandex.ru.js
1121 ms
advert.gif
796 ms
watch.js
8 ms
full-d4970f46344c5e9889e597ed64f3cc18926d2def.js
1411 ms
logo-web-ru-80x40.svg
422 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
150 ms
1
275 ms
1
146 ms
grab.cur
404 ms
grabbing.cur
376 ms
help.cur
415 ms
zoom_in.cur
417 ms
tiles
800 ms
tiles
932 ms
tiles
1135 ms
tiles
1255 ms
tiles
1301 ms
tiles
1279 ms
tiles
1312 ms
tiles
1155 ms
tiles
1276 ms
tiles
1343 ms
tiles
1438 ms
tiles
1452 ms
tiles
1523 ms
tiles
1475 ms
tiles
1539 ms
tiles
1583 ms
302 ms
texnolitural.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
texnolitural.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
texnolitural.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texnolitural.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texnolitural.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texnolitural.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Texnolitural. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: