Tools & Wizards About Us
texspand.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

texspand.com

Texspand Technologies – Enabling Business Expansion with Technology

Page Load Speed

17.2 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

13.4 sec

Page Rendered

706 ms

texspand.com screenshot

About Website

Visit texspand.com now to see the best up-to-date Texspand content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about texspand.com

Enabling Business Expansion with Technology Our mission is to be the Technology Consulting Partner for our customers; and enable them focus on their core business / domain needs, and let us take all t...

Visit texspand.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Texspand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 14.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

texspand.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,780 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

texspand.com

3030 ms

styles.css

221 ms

wp-ulike.min.css

341 ms

base.css

916 ms

auxin-icon.css

506 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Texspand.com, 28% (23 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Texspand.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (74%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

818.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Texspand.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 94.6 kB

  • Original 114.2 kB
  • After minification 100.8 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

  • Original 98.7 kB
  • After minification 77.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Texspand needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 888.7 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 554.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 888.7 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 167.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texspand.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (82%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texspand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

texspand.com

texspand.com

3030 ms

styles.css

styles.css

221 ms

wp-ulike.min.css

wp-ulike.min.css

341 ms

base.css

base.css

916 ms

auxin-icon.css

auxin-icon.css

506 ms

main.css

main.css

2865 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

986 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

505 ms

post-103.css

post-103.css

477 ms

elementor.css

elementor.css

659 ms

elementor-widgets.css

elementor-widgets.css

685 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

735 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

750 ms

post-102.css

post-102.css

828 ms

css

css

32 ms

custom.css

custom.css

848 ms

portfolio.css

portfolio.css

900 ms

post-31.css

post-31.css

913 ms

post-99.css

post-99.css

918 ms

css

css

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1437 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

990 ms

modernizr-custom.min.js

modernizr-custom.min.js

1017 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

918 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

984 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

2567 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

1641 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

1049 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

1655 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

1153 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

1270 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

1549 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1473 ms

portfolio.js

portfolio.js

1584 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1611 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1677 ms

index.js

index.js

1717 ms

index.js

index.js

1847 ms

api.js

api.js

62 ms

wp-ulike.min.js

wp-ulike.min.js

1781 ms

instant_click.min.js

instant_click.min.js

1668 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1569 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1592 ms

index.js

index.js

1490 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1449 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1640 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1368 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1398 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1550 ms

Texspand-ICON.jpg

Texspand-ICON.jpg

146 ms

Texspand-Logo.png

Texspand-Logo.png

145 ms

Image1-722x768.png

Image1-722x768.png

190 ms

Image2.png

Image2.png

189 ms

Image4.png

Image4.png

188 ms

Group_4056.svg

Group_4056.svg

146 ms

Group_4055.svg

Group_4055.svg

190 ms

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYkqUcKWmT.ttf

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYkqUcKWmT.ttf

99 ms

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYoKUcKWmT.ttf

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYoKUcKWmT.ttf

143 ms

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYTKIcKWmT.ttf

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYTKIcKWmT.ttf

172 ms

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYdaIcKWmT.ttf

KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYdaIcKWmT.ttf

203 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

171 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

171 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

171 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

171 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

173 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

173 ms

auxin-front.woff

auxin-front.woff

242 ms

KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWubEbVmUiA8.ttf

KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWubEbVmUiA8.ttf

130 ms

KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWub2bVmUiA8.ttf

KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWub2bVmUiA8.ttf

96 ms

KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuYaalmUiA8.ttf

KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuYaalmUiA8.ttf

96 ms

KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuYjalmUiA8.ttf

KFOMCniXp96ayz4E7kSn66aGLdTylUAMQXC89YmC2DPNWuYjalmUiA8.ttf

124 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

120 ms

symbols.svg

symbols.svg

156 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

63 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

62 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

62 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

65 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

64 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

64 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

64 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

65 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

66 ms

Accessibility Review

texspand.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

texspand.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

texspand.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texspand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texspand.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

texspand.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Texspand. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: