Tools & Wizards About Us
textcompare.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

textcompare.org

Online Text Compare Tool

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

125 ms

textcompare.org screenshot

About Website

Visit textcompare.org now to see the best up-to-date Text Compare content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about textcompare.org

Find difference between 2 text files. Just input or paste original and modified text and click Compare button. Fast, Private & Unlimited.

Visit textcompare.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Textcompare.org page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

textcompare.org performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,250 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.443

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

textcompare.org

71 ms

textcompare.org

63 ms

www.textcompare.org

81 ms

f2c91ccf480ff5a4.css

30 ms

fd9d1056-b817a7b8b21f5ed0.js

1076 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Textcompare.org, 3% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Textcompare.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 130.0 kB (82%)

Content Size

157.8 kB

After Optimization

27.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Textcompare.org main page is 157.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 154.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 129.9 kB

  • Original 154.0 kB
  • After minification 153.9 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 113 B

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Text Compare images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (91%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Text Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

textcompare.org

textcompare.org

71 ms

textcompare.org

textcompare.org

63 ms

www.textcompare.org

www.textcompare.org

81 ms

f2c91ccf480ff5a4.css

f2c91ccf480ff5a4.css

30 ms

fd9d1056-b817a7b8b21f5ed0.js

fd9d1056-b817a7b8b21f5ed0.js

1076 ms

7023-6a677c8b36d8c31f.js

7023-6a677c8b36d8c31f.js

67 ms

main-app-1f8b2b138563c79f.js

main-app-1f8b2b138563c79f.js

61 ms

8832-67ed7844e5b59be8.js

8832-67ed7844e5b59be8.js

55 ms

7825-3fc495872f919f41.js

7825-3fc495872f919f41.js

88 ms

231-0d6b99de98610108.js

231-0d6b99de98610108.js

63 ms

2404-ef0a8fb47da3fec6.js

2404-ef0a8fb47da3fec6.js

83 ms

4348-8f85080b6943115c.js

4348-8f85080b6943115c.js

88 ms

8655-e453da9eeaf8957f.js

8655-e453da9eeaf8957f.js

96 ms

5279-7169cd9ef250a235.js

5279-7169cd9ef250a235.js

99 ms

5381-951cdc3d9c9feb6e.js

5381-951cdc3d9c9feb6e.js

118 ms

998-7c0032723a4bb8c6.js

998-7c0032723a4bb8c6.js

122 ms

1720-1775e8b63ee7f426.js

1720-1775e8b63ee7f426.js

124 ms

layout-5ebd50d30c6669b9.js

layout-5ebd50d30c6669b9.js

133 ms

3037-ef4be687066fe8c2.js

3037-ef4be687066fe8c2.js

143 ms

8087-e477a07959bbcd70.js

8087-e477a07959bbcd70.js

170 ms

4765-b7c1fd0eed6313f4.js

4765-b7c1fd0eed6313f4.js

153 ms

8165-cfeaf091854d1430.js

8165-cfeaf091854d1430.js

158 ms

9951-63bf8231d21ebed1.js

9951-63bf8231d21ebed1.js

168 ms

7566-527835a5bc51908a.js

7566-527835a5bc51908a.js

166 ms

4583-1aa82549ed78a5c6.js

4583-1aa82549ed78a5c6.js

183 ms

4881-74d993b90bef4cbd.js

4881-74d993b90bef4cbd.js

195 ms

4116-aec230f0efa03da4.js

4116-aec230f0efa03da4.js

210 ms

2024-bf679ace99cb7189.js

2024-bf679ace99cb7189.js

199 ms

2967-770554d5598a1b7d.js

2967-770554d5598a1b7d.js

196 ms

page-c16b8ea708622a13.js

page-c16b8ea708622a13.js

220 ms

not-found-78b6cc64e3caaeb6.js

not-found-78b6cc64e3caaeb6.js

219 ms

6246-b9ef65d0eeb4b24b.js

6246-b9ef65d0eeb4b24b.js

220 ms

9446-ee90dd0d25e0c3fa.js

9446-ee90dd0d25e0c3fa.js

222 ms

layout-395097c7c373e5ab.js

layout-395097c7c373e5ab.js

246 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

286 ms

webpack-f0481de1f865fd45.js

webpack-f0481de1f865fd45.js

247 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

44 ms

logo.png

logo.png

45 ms

Accessibility Review

textcompare.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

textcompare.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

textcompare.org SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textcompare.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textcompare.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

textcompare.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Text Compare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: