Tools & Wizards About Us
textdiff.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

textdiff.com

Home - Text Comparison

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

364 ms

Resources Loaded

941 ms

Page Rendered

114 ms

textdiff.com screenshot

About Website

Visit textdiff.com now to see the best up-to-date Text Diff content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about textdiff.com

Text Comparison - Compare Strings online using Text_Diff at TextDiff.com

Visit textdiff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Textdiff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 364 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

textdiff.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.textdiff.com

364 ms

style-fluid.css

69 ms

button_green.gif

138 ms

layout.css

99 ms

layout_fluid.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Textdiff.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (364 ms) belongs to the original domain Textdiff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.4 kB (53%)

Content Size

32.9 kB

After Optimization

15.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Textdiff.com main page is 32.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 17.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 3.5 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 762 B, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 204 B

  • Original 10.9 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Text Diff images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textdiff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (50%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Text Diff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.textdiff.com

www.textdiff.com

364 ms

style-fluid.css

style-fluid.css

69 ms

button_green.gif

button_green.gif

138 ms

layout.css

layout.css

99 ms

layout_fluid.css

layout_fluid.css

69 ms

spring_flavour.css

spring_flavour.css

107 ms

spring_flavour_fluid.css

spring_flavour_fluid.css

74 ms

header_bg.jpg

header_bg.jpg

126 ms

corner_bottom_right.gif

corner_bottom_right.gif

71 ms

SEO Factors

textdiff.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textdiff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textdiff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

textdiff.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Text Diff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: