Tools & Wizards About Us
textexpander.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

textexpander.com

TextExpander: #1 Text Replacement & Keyboard Shortcut App

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

576 ms

Page Rendered

410 ms

textexpander.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to textexpander.com homepage info - get ready to check Text Expander best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about textexpander.com

TextExpander is the most popular text replacement and shortcut app. Generate custom word, sentence, and paragraph text with keyboard shortcuts.

Visit textexpander.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Textexpander.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 986 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

textexpander.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value17,020 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

textexpander.com

147 ms

textexpander.com

55 ms

css

57 ms

j.php

48 ms

9cf6467e96.js

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Textexpander.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Assets.calendly.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) relates to the external source Assets.calendly.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 54.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

326.1 kB

After Optimization

271.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Textexpander.com main page is 326.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 248.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 53.7 kB

  • Original 72.0 kB
  • After minification 71.9 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 340 B

  • Original 248.2 kB
  • After minification 247.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Text Expander images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 51 B

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 300 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 836 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textexpander.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 300 B or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (47%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Text Expander. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

textexpander.com

textexpander.com

147 ms

textexpander.com

textexpander.com

55 ms

css

css

57 ms

j.php

j.php

48 ms

9cf6467e96.js

9cf6467e96.js

182 ms

autoptimize_single_670ceb20bdffc3b0af99a495eb4e34ba.css

autoptimize_single_670ceb20bdffc3b0af99a495eb4e34ba.css

38 ms

public.min.css

public.min.css

52 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

75 ms

autoptimize_single_cf2a888a1dc52f26ba3ec8b7b5e67e7c.css

autoptimize_single_cf2a888a1dc52f26ba3ec8b7b5e67e7c.css

71 ms

iubenda_cs.js

iubenda_cs.js

132 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

58 ms

public.min.js

public.min.js

62 ms

v2.js

v2.js

68 ms

widget.css

widget.css

265 ms

widget.js

widget.js

376 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

55 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

61 ms

autoptimize_single_49493316c090bb3d7cca5bc09031037c.js

autoptimize_single_49493316c090bb3d7cca5bc09031037c.js

97 ms

autoptimize_single_0ed1eb0445c18086fe084ff461672615.js

autoptimize_single_0ed1eb0445c18086fe084ff461672615.js

98 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

104 ms

autoptimize_single_93d421fd7576b0ca9c359ffe2fa16113.js

autoptimize_single_93d421fd7576b0ca9c359ffe2fa16113.js

102 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

45 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

70 ms

bars-solid.svg

bars-solid.svg

34 ms

xmark-solid.svg

xmark-solid.svg

22 ms

stateofcustomertech-1.png

stateofcustomertech-1.png

31 ms

applicantpro.svg

applicantpro.svg

32 ms

uber.svg

uber.svg

27 ms

help-scout.svg

help-scout.svg

59 ms

dropbox.svg

dropbox.svg

46 ms

sketchup.svg

sketchup.svg

51 ms

tumblr.svg

tumblr.svg

57 ms

shopify.svg

shopify.svg

56 ms

1password.svg

1password.svg

60 ms

auburnuniversity.svg

auburnuniversity.svg

69 ms

genentech.svg

genentech.svg

75 ms

linode.svg

linode.svg

79 ms

crossover.svg

crossover.svg

89 ms

knowledege-activation.png

knowledege-activation.png

92 ms

te-home-31hourspermonth.svg

te-home-31hourspermonth.svg

89 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

52 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

70 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

81 ms

te-triangles.svg

te-triangles.svg

36 ms

Accessibility Review

textexpander.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

textexpander.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

textexpander.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textexpander.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textexpander.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

textexpander.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Text Expander. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: