1.1 sec in total
81 ms
357 ms
645 ms
Visit textipa.com now to see the best up-to-date Textipa content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about textipa.com
Visit textipa.comWe analyzed Textipa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
textipa.com performance score
81 ms
41 ms
56 ms
25 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Textipa.com, 53% (19 requests) were made to Images.textipa.com and 19% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (105 ms) relates to the external source Images.textipa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 200.2 kB (23%)
883.2 kB
683.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Textipa.com main page is 883.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 648.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.6 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Textipa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textipa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (11%)
28
25
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textipa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
textipa.com
81 ms
all.min.css
41 ms
desktop.min.css
56 ms
css
25 ms
css
53 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
12.jpg
105 ms
lines.png
91 ms
41.jpg
93 ms
43.jpg
94 ms
42.jpg
91 ms
24.jpg
86 ms
23.jpg
87 ms
1.jpg
93 ms
35.jpg
94 ms
3.jpg
91 ms
13.jpg
96 ms
37.jpg
93 ms
6.jpg
97 ms
20.jpg
96 ms
47.jpg
94 ms
7.jpg
100 ms
9.jpg
99 ms
24.jpg
102 ms
41.jpg
101 ms
50.jpg
100 ms
collect
29 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
28 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
37 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
37 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf
34 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
34 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nL3QFSXBldIn45k5A7iXhnc.ttf
33 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
39 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
31 ms
textipa.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textipa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textipa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
textipa.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Textipa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: