2.9 sec in total
204 ms
2.1 sec
542 ms
Welcome to textstr.com homepage info - get ready to check Textstr best content for Canada right away, or after learning these important things about textstr.com
Enable Text on Landlines and Toll-Free Numbers and Turn Reviews into Growth Opportunities with Our Unified Business Text Messaging Platform.
Visit textstr.comWe analyzed Textstr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
textstr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value1,520 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.732
6/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
204 ms
376 ms
476 ms
463 ms
607 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Textstr.com, 82% (36 requests) were made to D35alf4gb0w7kn.cloudfront.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (712 ms) relates to the external source D35alf4gb0w7kn.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 689.8 kB (43%)
1.6 MB
917.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Textstr.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 679.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Textstr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 366.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 366.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 302.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textstr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 302.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (38%)
39
24
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textstr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
textstr.com
204 ms
textstr.com
376 ms
normalize.min.css
476 ms
font-awesome.css
463 ms
foundation.min.css
607 ms
modernizr.js
466 ms
jquery.js
76 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
71 ms
additional-methods.min.js
77 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
532 ms
jquery.nanoscroller.min.js
712 ms
fastclick.js
556 ms
foundation.min.js
644 ms
css
57 ms
logo.png
149 ms
iPhone-hand2.png
362 ms
iPhone.png
408 ms
logo-boston.png
149 ms
logo-tribune.png
147 ms
logo-abc.png
148 ms
logo-nbc.png
306 ms
Patrick-Westin.jpg
331 ms
analytics.js
119 ms
bg-header2.jpg
217 ms
arrow-down.png
214 ms
bg-diamond.jpg
306 ms
bg-lower.jpg
421 ms
icon-play.png
402 ms
icon-touch.png
400 ms
icon-Q.png
427 ms
icon-connected.png
438 ms
icon-direction.png
499 ms
quotes-transparent.png
578 ms
textstr.js
465 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
91 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
92 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
423 ms
collect
35 ms
pc.html
113 ms
style-msg.css
10 ms
twilio-ip-messaging.min.js
7 ms
text-us2-chat.png
15 ms
view.gif
99 ms
roundtrip.js
21 ms
textstr.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
textstr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
textstr.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textstr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textstr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
textstr.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Textstr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: