5.4 sec in total
174 ms
4.4 sec
886 ms
Click here to check amazing Texture content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about texture.london
We are an integrated digital advertising and marketing agency for premium and luxury brands. We execute beautiful digital marketing campaigns, engage with audiences online and build best in class digi...
Visit texture.londonWe analyzed Texture.london page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
texture.london performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value15.1 s
0/100
25%
Value15.2 s
1/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.267
46/100
15%
Value18.6 s
3/100
10%
174 ms
1200 ms
382 ms
503 ms
420 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Texture.london, 79% (59 requests) were made to Texture.agency and 7% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Texture.agency.
Page size can be reduced by 571.0 kB (14%)
4.0 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Texture.london main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texture images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 188.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.2 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 260.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texture.london needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 260.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (45%)
66
36
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texture. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
texture.london
174 ms
texture.agency
1200 ms
style.min.css
382 ms
dashicons.min.css
503 ms
everest-forms.css
420 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.css
280 ms
slick.css
279 ms
slick-theme.css
280 ms
fullpage.min.css
371 ms
animate.min.css
647 ms
style.css
742 ms
texture-tweaks.css
462 ms
jquery.min.js
658 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
502 ms
apbct-public--functions.min.js
554 ms
apbct-public.min.js
585 ms
cleantalk-modal.min.js
585 ms
js
60 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
637 ms
slick.min.js
725 ms
core.min.js
724 ms
effect.min.js
635 ms
fullpage.min.js
724 ms
texture-home.js
766 ms
wow.min.js
766 ms
texture-scripts.js
767 ms
wp-embed.min.js
768 ms
widget.css
55 ms
widget.js
156 ms
gtm.js
67 ms
49ed530d5237922e1e69094155d6341a.gif
410 ms
bg-texture-3.png
219 ms
awwwards.png
131 ms
hp1.jpg
562 ms
hp2.jpg
830 ms
hp3.jpg
740 ms
bg-texture-1.png
218 ms
aboutbkg2.jpg
444 ms
luxuryfashion.jpeg
280 ms
services2.jpg
1006 ms
bg-texture-2.png
380 ms
joseph.png
465 ms
plogio.png
778 ms
hunt.png
558 ms
mv.png
652 ms
fg-13.png
745 ms
ovh.png
838 ms
joseph.jpg
1019 ms
arrow.png
839 ms
pragnell.jpg
1028 ms
hunt3.jpg
1300 ms
mvcampaign.jpg
1116 ms
fgshot.jpg
1024 ms
ovh.jpg
1256 ms
texture-map.jpg
1390 ms
twitter.png
1116 ms
facebook.png
1112 ms
instagram.png
1196 ms
nav_bkg.jpg
1210 ms
js
75 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
js
140 ms
FuturaPT-Book.woff
1137 ms
Raleway-Light.woff
1208 ms
Raleway-SemiBold.woff
1236 ms
Raleway-Bold.woff
1230 ms
Raleway.woff
1243 ms
Raleway-Medium.woff
1267 ms
collect
70 ms
collect
84 ms
41 ms
collect
38 ms
collect
30 ms
js
49 ms
29 ms
texture.london accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
texture.london best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
texture.london SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texture.london can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texture.london main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texture.london
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Texture. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: