Tools & Wizards About Us
texture.london screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

texture.london

Texture™ | Fashion & Luxury Digital Marketing Agency

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

185 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

777 ms

texture.london screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Texture content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about texture.london

We are an integrated digital advertising and marketing agency for premium and luxury brands. We execute beautiful digital marketing campaigns, engage with audiences online and build best in class digi...

Visit texture.london

Key Findings

We analyzed Texture.london page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

texture.london performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.303

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

texture.london

185 ms

texture.agency

1014 ms

style.min.css

371 ms

dashicons.min.css

526 ms

everest-forms.css

352 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Texture.london, 91% (59 requests) were made to Texture.agency and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Texture.agency.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 569.8 kB (14%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Texture.london main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 42.5 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 86.1 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texture images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 188.1 kB

  • Original 279.7 kB
  • After minification 276.9 kB
  • After compression 91.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 261.0 kB

  • Original 332.9 kB
  • After minification 312.4 kB
  • After compression 71.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texture.london needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 261.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (46%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texture. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

texture.london

texture.london

185 ms

texture.agency

texture.agency

1014 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

371 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

526 ms

everest-forms.css

everest-forms.css

352 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.css

jquery.bxslider.min.css

266 ms

slick.css

slick.css

271 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

272 ms

fullpage.min.css

fullpage.min.css

355 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

631 ms

style.css

style.css

722 ms

texture-tweaks.css

texture-tweaks.css

438 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

795 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

460 ms

apbct-public--functions.min.js

apbct-public--functions.min.js

527 ms

apbct-public.min.js

apbct-public.min.js

549 ms

cleantalk-modal.min.js

cleantalk-modal.min.js

612 ms

js

js

62 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

603 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

633 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

603 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

624 ms

fullpage.min.js

fullpage.min.js

784 ms

texture-home.js

texture-home.js

690 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

782 ms

texture-scripts.js

texture-scripts.js

782 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

782 ms

widget.css

widget.css

205 ms

widget.js

widget.js

375 ms

bg-texture-3.png

bg-texture-3.png

235 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

70 ms

c2921de52300b52f5f7ea2b0b9eb9b2c.gif

c2921de52300b52f5f7ea2b0b9eb9b2c.gif

416 ms

awwwards.png

awwwards.png

92 ms

hp1.jpg

hp1.jpg

451 ms

hp2.jpg

hp2.jpg

531 ms

hp3.jpg

hp3.jpg

633 ms

bg-texture-1.png

bg-texture-1.png

140 ms

aboutbkg2.jpg

aboutbkg2.jpg

361 ms

luxuryfashion.jpeg

luxuryfashion.jpeg

228 ms

services2.jpg

services2.jpg

1015 ms

bg-texture-2.png

bg-texture-2.png

316 ms

joseph.png

joseph.png

403 ms

plogio.png

plogio.png

632 ms

hunt.png

hunt.png

578 ms

mv.png

mv.png

540 ms

fg-13.png

fg-13.png

706 ms

ovh.png

ovh.png

721 ms

joseph.jpg

joseph.jpg

926 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

721 ms

pragnell.jpg

pragnell.jpg

811 ms

hunt3.jpg

hunt3.jpg

970 ms

mvcampaign.jpg

mvcampaign.jpg

990 ms

fgshot.jpg

fgshot.jpg

904 ms

ovh.jpg

ovh.jpg

993 ms

texture-map.jpg

texture-map.jpg

1178 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

1013 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

1059 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

1081 ms

nav_bkg.jpg

nav_bkg.jpg

1084 ms

FuturaPT-Book.woff

FuturaPT-Book.woff

1044 ms

Raleway-Light.woff

Raleway-Light.woff

1048 ms

Raleway-SemiBold.woff

Raleway-SemiBold.woff

1092 ms

Raleway-Bold.woff

Raleway-Bold.woff

1114 ms

Raleway.woff

Raleway.woff

1120 ms

Raleway-Medium.woff

Raleway-Medium.woff

1141 ms

Accessibility Review

texture.london accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

texture.london best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

texture.london SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texture.london can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texture.london main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

texture.london

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Texture. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: