8.5 sec in total
796 ms
7.2 sec
450 ms
Welcome to tggr.com homepage info - get ready to check Tggr best content right away, or after learning these important things about tggr.com
Visit tggr.comWe analyzed Tggr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 796 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
tggr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.08
94/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
796 ms
92 ms
402 ms
384 ms
383 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Tggr.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Tggr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 449.0 kB (34%)
1.3 MB
877.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Tggr.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 675.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 387.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 60.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 387.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tggr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 35.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tggr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.2 kB or 48% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 83 (77%)
108
25
The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tggr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 66 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tggr.com
796 ms
js
92 ms
ajax-progress.module.css
402 ms
align.module.css
384 ms
autocomplete-loading.module.css
383 ms
fieldgroup.module.css
396 ms
container-inline.module.css
387 ms
clearfix.module.css
653 ms
details.module.css
742 ms
hidden.module.css
753 ms
item-list.module.css
748 ms
js.module.css
751 ms
nowrap.module.css
757 ms
position-container.module.css
1022 ms
progress.module.css
1098 ms
reset-appearance.module.css
1104 ms
resize.module.css
1121 ms
sticky-header.module.css
1109 ms
system-status-counter.css
1119 ms
system-status-report-counters.css
1379 ms
system-status-report-general-info.css
1469 ms
tabledrag.module.css
1460 ms
tablesort.module.css
1464 ms
tree-child.module.css
1470 ms
views.module.css
1475 ms
user.css
1504 ms
progress.css
1818 ms
affix.css
1818 ms
book.css
1823 ms
contextual.css
1841 ms
feed-icon.css
1840 ms
field.css
1870 ms
header.css
2170 ms
help.css
1949 ms
icons.css
2178 ms
image-button.css
2203 ms
item-list.css
2193 ms
bootstrap.min.css
34 ms
all.css
161 ms
745423589
158 ms
jquery-ui.css
44 ms
jquery-3.6.0.js
48 ms
jquery-ui.js
52 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
4 ms
list-group.css
1945 ms
media.css
1929 ms
page.css
2157 ms
search-form.css
2168 ms
shortcut.css
2160 ms
sidebar.css
2181 ms
site-footer.css
1947 ms
skip-link.css
1928 ms
table.css
1915 ms
tabledrag.css
2159 ms
tableselect.css
2158 ms
tablesort-indicator.css
2193 ms
ui.widget.css
1946 ms
tabs.css
1699 ms
toolbar.css
1924 ms
vertical-tabs.css
2051 ms
views.css
2147 ms
webform.css
2148 ms
ui-dialog.css
1940 ms
slick.css
1877 ms
slick-theme.css
1935 ms
style.css
2165 ms
colors.css
2148 ms
messages-white.css
2155 ms
email-decode.min.js
1817 ms
jquery.min.js
1891 ms
element.matches.js
1890 ms
object.assign.js
2012 ms
once.min.js
2136 ms
jquery.once.min.js
2156 ms
drupalSettingsLoader.js
2128 ms
drupal.js
2099 ms
drupal.init.js
1910 ms
jquery.rua.js
2007 ms
jquery.once.bc.js
2134 ms
barrio.js
2133 ms
affix.js
2128 ms
slick.min.js
2114 ms
global.js
1901 ms
LOGO_EN.png
2104 ms
aegean.jpg
2135 ms
WTE_0.jpg
2117 ms
blue%20star.jpg
2126 ms
avis.jpg
2117 ms
anek.png
2235 ms
folegandros.png
2362 ms
philoxenia.png
2246 ms
zante-voyage.png
2154 ms
alpe.jpg
2133 ms
karpenisi.jpg
2204 ms
superfast.jpg
2230 ms
hellenic%20seaways.jpg
2268 ms
paros%20logo_0.jpg
2300 ms
3.jpg
2238 ms
AGIOS%20DIONYSIOS%20VRADY1.jpg
2308 ms
20230309_110456.jpg
2205 ms
20231106_143400_0.jpg
2405 ms
20230501_125517.jpg
2499 ms
e-banner-espa.jpg
2696 ms
footer-logo-gr.png
2261 ms
css2
30 ms
css2
43 ms
css2
49 ms
background-sea.jpg
2565 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk79FO_F.ttf
119 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4aE-_F.ttf
126 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E-_F.ttf
197 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
72 ms
print.css
357 ms
tggr.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
tggr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tggr.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tggr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tggr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tggr.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tggr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: